Message-ID: <094ab51d-d99f-ee08-4e8b-946cc85ccfd6@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 13 Mar 2023 20:36:56 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.11.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/9] net: sunhme: Probe/IRQ cleanups
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc:     "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>,
        debian-sparc@lists.debian.org, rescue@sunhelp.org, sparc@gentoo.org
References: <20230311181905.3593904-1-seanga2@gmail.com>
 <20230313172738.3508810f@kernel.org>
From:   Sean Anderson <seanga2@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230313172738.3508810f@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 3/13/23 20:27, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Mar 2023 13:18:56 -0500 Sean Anderson wrote:
>> Well, I've had these patches kicking around in my tree since last October, so I
>> guess I had better get around to posting them. This series is mainly a
>> cleanup/consolidation of the probe process, with some interrupt changes as well.
>> Some of these changes are SBUS- (AKA SPARC-) specific, so this should really get
>> some testing there as well to ensure nothing breaks. I've CC'd a few SPARC
>> mailing lists in hopes that someone there can try this out. I also have an SBUS
>> card I ordered by mistake if anyone has a SPARC computer but lacks this card.
>>
>> I had originally planned on adding phylib support to this driver in the hopes of
>> being able to use real phy drivers, but I don't think I'm going to end up doing
>> that. I wanted to be able to use an external (homegrown) phy, but as it turns
>> out you can't buy MII cables in $CURRENTYEAR for under $250 a pop, and even if
>> you could get them you can't buy the connectors either. Oh well...
> 
> Doesn't apply to net-next, please note we're using the branch called
> *main* now.

Looks like I based this on another patch but forgot to send it. I've resent the series
with this patch squashed in.

--Sean