MIME-Version: 1.0
From:   Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 Mar 2023 08:21:50 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKXUXMwwQuwssyzBrOXHOz__YRpa1Rjgqmwn5rRFjDVLBbabPA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Question about the dependency on the config SOC_FSL in CPM_QMC
To:     Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>,
        Li Yang <leoyang.li@nxp.com>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Qiang Zhao <qiang.zhao@nxp.com>
Cc:     linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors <kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Dear Herve,

In your patch below, you added the config CPM_QMC which depends on the
non-existing config SOC_FSL:

https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230217145645.1768659-7-herve.codina@bootlin.com

Up to my knowledge, the config SOC_FSL never existed in the mainline
tree. Is this dependency really required or can the expression simply
be reduced to COMPILE_TEST and we drop the dependency to SOC_FSL?

Note: This patch has now shown up in linux-next with commit
3178d58e0b97. Currently, it would not be possible to compile test this
driver, as the dependency on SOC_FSL is never met.


Best regards,

Lukas