Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D94AC7618B for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 08:17:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229636AbjCNIRZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Mar 2023 04:17:25 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59546 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229513AbjCNIQe (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Mar 2023 04:16:34 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x529.google.com (mail-ed1-x529.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::529]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96C1C99D55 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 01:14:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x529.google.com with SMTP id o12so58494827edb.9 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 01:14:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1678781689; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=wboTlz+tvE23niIuCWa5AP83n6xHxsyLfDerF7pTjSM=; b=OMP2Pg2VucXTq3RaZgj0lXYSRxiP1CU+5fgZV/OifjHXkNe3jrAe7fhzW3Lzeix2IF n9OMJc3GsHvLkDu4JiZ2Iwq14i52HSIKWYpPlEL+cio7KhsG79+XiTxSfWPBJzH8NZV6 ZavvTnSluRMmpsBDKxSO+Bf5hV35cM0z/UDUpURuk/1UdJlbBARpwFKqnw8WHMX/9qXV lu4GBms2S3lNWQRnb0NGH7EVPH++QGB7epyUfUBPtyc/Gg8AMV4u6TczbtWnq0cnQa3B i5CC2zq0BeZDt64qawKjD4G5ZMtSeuEHU+hv5/V6t4WA+GfQv3NyaSOZGcf2/AxULVuo NnTg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1678781689; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=wboTlz+tvE23niIuCWa5AP83n6xHxsyLfDerF7pTjSM=; b=VltBoWtY1yUTwu4gNTWbBAzSRxd2HzN4MdOXKo5D6hgt+VWEDWIDdTZa+VbEHeSxJV 8JPjLpDuoGZsgMWRxHGjQhuoMQus/0AhS7zjWytryZ3AnVzuaeD9warudnZ1E09CxrgS dKctTN/eS5xOKyWlbZAgFDrhBqC/ZUatbRT4vgXvoDw9MwXPxbUxYTNQVn4FwjL9nO/k OT6Ik2UOIlMxlY5h388b0DYQWqKQBcDVVnC49JfTP13HxheLcIiHjQAnVoODOrCn5kWp kh/32lyFK9gKxwczzm+JYC4rhokokM5iP0UAVFNdgMchD6Mx02WQUKfw96K1PzKDVNxq 8k7Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKXxRpKXSnJO5LSPekhTCGq+sy01e0ryn9kdKYlntBAhdfDLVBFl 8ywiN9ZdRArGqs4ZdujNH+W0yg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set+faacEFbuyaWCfRFYG2V0EhpSmAjWujyP1fyxeJV54nDc+J7N1cs8blrEkU+GccFX2iB7UoQ== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c245:0:b0:4ac:c44e:a493 with SMTP id y5-20020aa7c245000000b004acc44ea493mr36246588edo.2.1678781689499; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 01:14:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2a02:810d:15c0:828:6932:5570:6254:9edd? ([2a02:810d:15c0:828:6932:5570:6254:9edd]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v10-20020a50a44a000000b004fd204d180dsm600243edb.64.2023.03.14.01.14.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 14 Mar 2023 01:14:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <43a38d58-c105-cdc7-2d83-affd9d724780@linaro.org> Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 09:14:48 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.8.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] mailbox: qcom-apcs-ipc: drop the IPQ8074 and IPQ5332 compatible Content-Language: en-US To: Kathiravan T , agross@kernel.org, andersson@kernel.org, konrad.dybcio@linaro.org, jassisinghbrar@gmail.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org References: <20230314050005.10409-1-quic_kathirav@quicinc.com> <20230314050005.10409-3-quic_kathirav@quicinc.com> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: <20230314050005.10409-3-quic_kathirav@quicinc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 14/03/2023 06:00, Kathiravan T wrote: > Since the IPQ8074 and IPQ5332 mailbox are compatible with IPQ6018, we can > use the compatible fallback to IPQ6018. With that, we can drop the > IPQ8074 and IPQ5332 compatible references, as well we don't bloat the > of_device_id table. > > Suggested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski I never suggested anything like this, so: NAK (also responded to v1) Best regards, Krzysztof