Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92B9CC6FD1C for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 09:22:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230491AbjCNJWX (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Mar 2023 05:22:23 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35494 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229704AbjCNJWU (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Mar 2023 05:22:20 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACE3A233FC; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 02:22:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1678785738; x=1710321738; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=669AdwOG4a24zmUH38pGEUS6+rjOIvBAa8LuWIw2i1k=; b=P6rPTQuAMaa949xDZJlJSrIb+1qWkkXo6hPg7IQbcYcSfOWXZsFL6UO3 NzrC7ny6BrTgL9Ec9+h2SMKy+FwwXJNkDs3Gq3nWabMBkqR5+Tc+R8uh8 TWBEL9arpaUi5QcKbpQkN+rsqkXPP3Cc5rizA12GMOS2qH+zGZvttarW8 BZoVcaBDWyzGi8YChyPzcO7x+n9nkE/MoBdwERx+u6MVjZ5YOBnwV3yEh 3i+Wfy0MyUgumDkiIQHVq8XHk4CMz3/OnPuYZ9mgy9GXj5mjvKZKhQl4x QCHzqr0KtlZH4vtXbRZbNINhEovY3q99gphrGCJEZHDb84Fvaj9Aqt33K g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10648"; a="338917167" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.98,259,1673942400"; d="scan'208";a="338917167" Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Mar 2023 02:22:18 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10648"; a="822292265" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.98,259,1673942400"; d="scan'208";a="822292265" Received: from kuha.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.185]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with SMTP; 14 Mar 2023 02:22:14 -0700 Received: by kuha.fi.intel.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 14 Mar 2023 11:22:13 +0200 Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 11:22:13 +0200 From: Heikki Krogerus To: Frank Wang Cc: linux@roeck-us.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, heiko@sntech.de, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, huangtao@rock-chips.com, william.wu@rock-chips.com, jianwei.zheng@rock-chips.com, yubing.zhang@rock-chips.com, wmc@rock-chips.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] usb: typec: tcpm: fix multiple times discover svids error Message-ID: References: <20230313025843.17162-1-frank.wang@rock-chips.com> <20230313025843.17162-3-frank.wang@rock-chips.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230313025843.17162-3-frank.wang@rock-chips.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 10:58:41AM +0800, Frank Wang wrote: > PD3.0 Spec 6.4.4.3.2 say that only Responder supports 12 or more SVIDs, > the Discover SVIDs Command Shall be executed multiple times until a > Discover SVIDs VDO is returned ending either with a SVID value of > 0x0000 in the last part of the last VDO or with a VDO containing two > SVIDs with values of 0x0000. > > In the current implementation, if the last VDO does not find that the > Discover SVIDs Command would be executed multiple times even if the > Responder SVIDs are less than 12, and we found some odd dockers just > meet this case. So fix it. > > Signed-off-by: Frank Wang > --- > drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c | 16 +++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c > index 66de02a56f512..2962f7c261976 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c > @@ -1515,7 +1515,21 @@ static bool svdm_consume_svids(struct tcpm_port *port, const u32 *p, int cnt) > pmdata->svids[pmdata->nsvids++] = svid; > tcpm_log(port, "SVID %d: 0x%x", pmdata->nsvids, svid); > } > - return true; > + > + /* > + * PD3.0 Spec 6.4.4.3.2: The SVIDs are returned 2 per VDO (see Table > + * 6-43), and can be returned maximum 6 VDOs per response (see Figure > + * 6-19). If the Respondersupports 12 or more SVID then the Discover > + * SVIDs Command Shall be executed multiple times until a Discover > + * SVIDs VDO is returned ending either with a SVID value of 0x0000 in > + * the last part of the last VDO or with a VDO containing two SVIDs > + * with values of 0x0000. > + * > + * However, some odd dockers support SVIDs less than 12 but without > + * 0x0000 in the last VDO, so we need to break the Discover SVIDs > + * request and return false here. > + */ > + return cnt == 7 ? true : false; return cnt == 7 thanks, -- heikki