Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55506C6FD1D for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 10:35:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229881AbjCNKff (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Mar 2023 06:35:35 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52854 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231395AbjCNKfK (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Mar 2023 06:35:10 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11D0E95BE0; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 03:34:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 872F81063; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 03:35:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e123648.arm.com (unknown [10.57.19.101]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 05FC23F71A; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 03:34:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Lukasz Luba To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org Cc: lukasz.luba@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rui.zhang@intel.com, amit.kucheria@verdurent.com, amit.kachhap@gmail.com, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, len.brown@intel.com, pavel@ucw.cz, Pierre.Gondois@arm.com, ionela.voinescu@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, mhiramat@kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 02/17] PM: EM: Find first CPU online while updating OPP efficiency Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 10:33:42 +0000 Message-Id: <20230314103357.26010-3-lukasz.luba@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20230314103357.26010-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com> References: <20230314103357.26010-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The Energy Model might be updated at runtime and the energy efficiency for each OPP may change. Thus, there is a need to update also the cpufreq framework and make it aligned to the new values. In order to do that, use a first online CPU from the Performance Domain. Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba --- kernel/power/energy_model.c | 11 +++++++++-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/power/energy_model.c b/kernel/power/energy_model.c index 265d51a948d4..3d8d1fad00ac 100644 --- a/kernel/power/energy_model.c +++ b/kernel/power/energy_model.c @@ -246,12 +246,19 @@ em_cpufreq_update_efficiencies(struct device *dev, struct em_perf_state *table) struct em_perf_domain *pd = dev->em_pd; struct cpufreq_policy *policy; int found = 0; - int i; + int i, cpu; if (!_is_cpu_device(dev) || !pd) return; - policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpumask_first(em_span_cpus(pd))); + /* Try to get a CPU which is online and in this PD */ + cpu = cpumask_first_and(em_span_cpus(pd), cpu_active_mask); + if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) { + dev_warn(dev, "EM: No online CPU for CPUFreq policy\n"); + return; + } + + policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu); if (!policy) { dev_warn(dev, "EM: Access to CPUFreq policy failed"); return; -- 2.17.1