Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D958BC7618E for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2023 05:41:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231339AbjCOFlq (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Mar 2023 01:41:46 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36424 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231276AbjCOFlj (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Mar 2023 01:41:39 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCC194DE24; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 22:41:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFB80169C; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 22:16:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from a077893.blr.arm.com (unknown [10.162.41.10]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id CBB333F67D; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 22:15:18 -0700 (PDT) From: Anshuman Khandual To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, will@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com Cc: Anshuman Khandual , Mark Brown , James Clark , Rob Herring , Marc Zyngier , Suzuki Poulose , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH V9 05/10] arm64/perf: Add branch stack support in ARMV8 PMU Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 10:44:39 +0530 Message-Id: <20230315051444.1683170-6-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20230315051444.1683170-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> References: <20230315051444.1683170-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This enables support for branch stack sampling event in ARMV8 PMU, checking has_branch_stack() on the event inside 'struct arm_pmu' callbacks. Although these branch stack helpers armv8pmu_branch_XXXXX() are just dummy functions for now. While here, this also defines arm_pmu's sched_task() callback with armv8pmu_sched_task(), which resets the branch record buffer on a sched_in. Cc: Catalin Marinas Cc: Will Deacon Cc: Mark Rutland Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual --- arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h | 33 +++++++++++++ arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++--------- 2 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h index 3eaf462f5752..463f23c3484f 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h @@ -273,4 +273,37 @@ extern unsigned long perf_misc_flags(struct pt_regs *regs); (regs)->pstate = PSR_MODE_EL1h; \ } +struct pmu_hw_events; +struct arm_pmu; +struct perf_event; + +#ifdef CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS +static inline bool has_branch_stack(struct perf_event *event); + +static inline void armv8pmu_branch_read(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event) +{ + WARN_ON_ONCE(!has_branch_stack(event)); +} + +static inline bool armv8pmu_branch_valid(struct perf_event *event) +{ + WARN_ON_ONCE(!has_branch_stack(event)); + return false; +} + +static inline void armv8pmu_branch_enable(struct perf_event *event) +{ + WARN_ON_ONCE(!has_branch_stack(event)); +} + +static inline void armv8pmu_branch_disable(struct perf_event *event) +{ + WARN_ON_ONCE(!has_branch_stack(event)); +} + +static inline void armv8pmu_branch_probe(struct arm_pmu *arm_pmu) { } +static inline void armv8pmu_branch_reset(void) { } +static inline int armv8pmu_private_alloc(struct arm_pmu *arm_pmu) { return 0; } +static inline void armv8pmu_private_free(struct arm_pmu *arm_pmu) { } +#endif #endif diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c index dde06c0f97f3..6d7c4f91cbf7 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c @@ -769,38 +769,21 @@ static void armv8pmu_enable_event(struct perf_event *event) * Enable counter and interrupt, and set the counter to count * the event that we're interested in. */ - - /* - * Disable counter - */ armv8pmu_disable_event_counter(event); - - /* - * Set event. - */ armv8pmu_write_event_type(event); - - /* - * Enable interrupt for this counter - */ armv8pmu_enable_event_irq(event); - - /* - * Enable counter - */ armv8pmu_enable_event_counter(event); + + if (has_branch_stack(event)) + armv8pmu_branch_enable(event); } static void armv8pmu_disable_event(struct perf_event *event) { - /* - * Disable counter - */ - armv8pmu_disable_event_counter(event); + if (has_branch_stack(event)) + armv8pmu_branch_disable(event); - /* - * Disable interrupt for this counter - */ + armv8pmu_disable_event_counter(event); armv8pmu_disable_event_irq(event); } @@ -878,6 +861,12 @@ static irqreturn_t armv8pmu_handle_irq(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu) if (!armpmu_event_set_period(event)) continue; + if (has_branch_stack(event)) { + WARN_ON(!cpuc->branches); + armv8pmu_branch_read(cpuc, event); + perf_sample_save_brstack(&data, event, &cpuc->branches->branch_stack); + } + /* * Perf event overflow will queue the processing of the event as * an irq_work which will be taken care of in the handling of @@ -976,6 +965,14 @@ static int armv8pmu_user_event_idx(struct perf_event *event) return event->hw.idx; } +static void armv8pmu_sched_task(struct perf_event_pmu_context *pmu_ctx, bool sched_in) +{ + struct arm_pmu *armpmu = to_arm_pmu(pmu_ctx->pmu); + + if (sched_in && arm_pmu_branch_stack_supported(armpmu)) + armv8pmu_branch_reset(); +} + /* * Add an event filter to a given event. */ @@ -1046,6 +1043,9 @@ static void armv8pmu_reset(void *info) pmcr |= ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LP; armv8pmu_pmcr_write(pmcr); + + if (arm_pmu_branch_stack_supported(cpu_pmu)) + armv8pmu_branch_reset(); } static int __armv8_pmuv3_map_event(struct perf_event *event, @@ -1063,6 +1063,9 @@ static int __armv8_pmuv3_map_event(struct perf_event *event, &armv8_pmuv3_perf_cache_map, ARMV8_PMU_EVTYPE_EVENT); + if (has_branch_stack(event) && !armv8pmu_branch_valid(event)) + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + /* * CHAIN events only work when paired with an adjacent counter, and it * never makes sense for a user to open one in isolation, as they'll be @@ -1183,6 +1186,21 @@ static void __armv8pmu_probe_pmu(void *info) cpu_pmu->reg_pmmir = read_cpuid(PMMIR_EL1); else cpu_pmu->reg_pmmir = 0; + armv8pmu_branch_probe(cpu_pmu); +} + +static int branch_records_alloc(struct arm_pmu *armpmu) +{ + struct pmu_hw_events *events; + int cpu; + + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { + events = per_cpu_ptr(armpmu->hw_events, cpu); + events->branches = kzalloc(sizeof(struct branch_records), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!events->branches) + return -ENOMEM; + } + return 0; } static int armv8pmu_probe_pmu(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu) @@ -1193,12 +1211,24 @@ static int armv8pmu_probe_pmu(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu) }; int ret; + ret = armv8pmu_private_alloc(cpu_pmu); + if (ret) + return ret; + ret = smp_call_function_any(&cpu_pmu->supported_cpus, __armv8pmu_probe_pmu, &probe, 1); if (ret) return ret; + if (arm_pmu_branch_stack_supported(cpu_pmu)) { + ret = branch_records_alloc(cpu_pmu); + if (ret) + return ret; + } else { + armv8pmu_private_free(cpu_pmu); + } + return probe.present ? 0 : -ENODEV; } @@ -1262,6 +1292,7 @@ static int armv8_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu, char *name, cpu_pmu->set_event_filter = armv8pmu_set_event_filter; cpu_pmu->pmu.event_idx = armv8pmu_user_event_idx; + cpu_pmu->sched_task = armv8pmu_sched_task; cpu_pmu->name = name; cpu_pmu->map_event = map_event; -- 2.25.1