MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230314131427.85135-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
 <20230314131427.85135-3-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> <20230314220924.52dfb803@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20230314220924.52dfb803@kernel.org>
From:   Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 Mar 2023 16:28:38 +0800
Message-ID: <CAL+tcoCOKwR-xPNO2Pb9sFAujb_nb60saJHjvXS6tM-7uqimtA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 2/2] net: introduce budget_squeeze to help us
 tune rx behavior
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc:     davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
        ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, hawk@kernel.org,
        john.fastabend@gmail.com, stephen@networkplumber.org,
        simon.horman@corigine.com, sinquersw@gmail.com,
        bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 1:09=E2=80=AFPM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wr=
ote:
>
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 21:14:27 +0800 Jason Xing wrote:
> > When we encounter some performance issue and then get lost on how
> > to tune the budget limit and time limit in net_rx_action() function,
> > we can separately counting both of them to avoid the confusion.
>
[...]
> More details please, we can't tell whether your solution makes sense
> if we don't know what your problem is.

Roger that. I'll write more details into the commit message.

Thanks,
Jason