Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4027AC74A5B for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2023 10:03:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231699AbjCOKDz (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Mar 2023 06:03:55 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55288 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231708AbjCOKDd (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Mar 2023 06:03:33 -0400 Received: from dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (unknown [45.249.212.56]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D37D7CA12; Wed, 15 Mar 2023 03:02:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.67.169]) by dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Pc5XW3LVSz4f3s6R; Wed, 15 Mar 2023 18:02:03 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.174.176.73] (unknown [10.174.176.73]) by APP3 (Coremail) with SMTP id _Ch0CgDX0R+clxFkayjWEw--.46752S3; Wed, 15 Mar 2023 18:02:05 +0800 (CST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] md: protect md_thread with a new disk level spin lock To: Guoqing Jiang , Yu Kuai , agk@redhat.com, snitzer@kernel.org, song@kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, yi.zhang@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com, "yukuai (C)" References: <20230315061810.653263-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> <20230315061810.653263-6-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> <16613534-5482-23c5-fa97-cfaedecab3d7@linux.dev> From: Yu Kuai Message-ID: <7cc22b63-a2f7-67ed-1a50-9fb415fadb81@huaweicloud.com> Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 18:02:04 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <16613534-5482-23c5-fa97-cfaedecab3d7@linux.dev> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID: _Ch0CgDX0R+clxFkayjWEw--.46752S3 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoW7Kw1fWw4DArWxJw13JF43KFg_yoW8Gr4rpr yxXFy5JrWUCr1kAr18J3WUJa4Yyr1Iq3WUAry5WF17Jw15GryaqryjvFyjgF1DXF48Jr4D Jr15tF4fZryDJr7anT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUU9214x267AKxVW8JVW5JwAFc2x0x2IEx4CE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0 rVWrJVCq3wAFIxvE14AKwVWUJVWUGwA2ocxC64kIII0Yj41l84x0c7CEw4AK67xGY2AK02 1l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvE14v26w1j6s0DM28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r4U JVWxJr1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv67AKxVW0oVCq3wA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gc CE3s1le2I262IYc4CY6c8Ij28IcVAaY2xG8wAqx4xG64xvF2IEw4CE5I8CrVC2j2WlYx0E 2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_JrI_JrylYx0Ex4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMcvjeVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJV W8JwACjcxG0xvEwIxGrwACjI8F5VA0II8E6IAqYI8I648v4I1lFIxGxcIEc7CjxVA2Y2ka 0xkIwI1lc7I2V7IY0VAS07AlzVAYIcxG8wCF04k20xvY0x0EwIxGrwCFx2IqxVCFs4IE7x kEbVWUJVW8JwC20s026c02F40E14v26r1j6r18MI8I3I0E7480Y4vE14v26r106r1rMI8E 67AF67kF1VAFwI0_Jw0_GFylIxkGc2Ij64vIr41lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUCw CI42IY6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Cr1lIxAIcVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6rWUJVWr Zr1UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Gr1UYx BIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x0JUZa9-UUUUU= X-CM-SenderInfo: 51xn3trlr6x35dzhxuhorxvhhfrp/ X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, 在 2023/03/15 17:39, Guoqing Jiang 写道: > > > On 3/15/23 14:18, Yu Kuai wrote: >> From: Yu Kuai >> >> Our test reports a uaf for 'mddev->sync_thread': >> >> T1                      T2 >> md_start_sync >>   md_register_thread >>             raid1d >>              md_check_recovery >>               md_reap_sync_thread >>                md_unregister_thread >>                 kfree >> >>   md_wakeup_thread >>    wake_up >>    ->sync_thread was freed > > Better to provide the relevant uaf (user after free perhaps you mean) > log from the test. Ok, I'll add uaf report(the report is from v5.10) in the next version. > >> Currently, a global spinlock 'pers_lock' is borrowed to protect >> 'mddev->thread', this problem can be fixed likewise, however, there might >> be similar problem for other md_thread, and I really don't like the >> idea to >> borrow a global lock. >> >> This patch use a disk level spinlock to protect md_thread in relevant >> apis. > > It is array level I think, and you probably want to remove the comment. > > * pers_lockdoes extra service to protect accesses to > * mddev->thread when the mutex cannot be held. Yes, I missed this. Thanks, Kuai > > Thanks, > Guoqing > . >