Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756894AbXIQUDJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:03:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755333AbXIQUC5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:02:57 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:42213 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754873AbXIQUC4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:02:56 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 22:01:56 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Willy Tarreau Cc: Oleg Verych , Roman Zippel , Rob Hussey , efault@gmx.de, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ck@vds.kolivas.org Subject: Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up Message-ID: <20070917200156.GA11814@elte.hu> References: <6b8cef970709170221s4301e896x2ee123a149c05c3a@mail.gmail.com> <20070917112707.GA24583@elte.hu> <20070917194342.GB20271@1wt.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070917194342.GB20271@1wt.eu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.1.7-deb -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1516 Lines: 36 * Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 09:45:59PM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: > > The copy list, removed by Ingo is restored. Playing fair game, Willy! > > Sorry Oleg, I don't understand why you added me to this thread. And I > don't understand at all what your intent was :-/ > > I've left others Cc too since they wonder like me. i'm wondering too. in my posted debugging answer, instead of replying privately to Rob, i have also Cc:-ed lkml and ck-list. (perhaps i shouldnt even have Cc:-ed the lists, as my posted debugging questions and suggestions were mostly relevant to Rob and to me - but it's better to keep such things archived on the lists, if someone wants to read them. In the first mail i also Cc:-ed Mike and Peter who changed the scheduler recently - but i dropped them after my first reply when it became apparent that it's not their changes that are affected. With all lists still Cc:-ed, so that people can follow it if they really want to.) I'd expect any new results to be posted by Rob to everyone he wishes to send them to - like he did it in the past. Or is Oleg perhaps complaining about the fact that i Cc:-ed this back to both affected email lists, for everyone to read? Would be a weird argument. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/