Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758694AbXIQUnh (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:43:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756401AbXIQUna (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:43:30 -0400 Received: from THUNK.ORG ([69.25.196.29]:54958 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756311AbXIQUn2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:43:28 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:43:18 -0400 From: Theodore Tso To: Claudio Jeker , Adrian Bunk , "Can E. Acar" , misc@openbsd.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Hazelton , Eben Moglen , Lawrence Lessig , "Bradley M. Kuhn" , Matt Norwood Subject: Re: Wasting our Freedom Message-ID: <20070917204318.GE18360@thunk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Theodore Tso , Claudio Jeker , Adrian Bunk , "Can E. Acar" , misc@openbsd.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Hazelton , Eben Moglen , Lawrence Lessig , "Bradley M. Kuhn" , Matt Norwood References: <46ED7A8F.1020304@pro-g.com.tr> <20070916195909.GA18232@stusta.de> <20070916203926.GA17863@schlund.de> <20070916211208.GC5502@thunk.org> <20070917125554.GB13179@diehard.n-r-g.com> <20070917133458.GA18360@thunk.org> <20070917192341.GB30119@diehard.n-r-g.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070917192341.GB30119@diehard.n-r-g.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on thunker.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2109 Lines: 41 On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 09:23:41PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote: > Because they put their copyright plus license on code that they barely > modified. If they would have added substantial work into the OpenHAL code > and by doing that creating something new I would not say much. Number 1, some of the Linux wireless developers screwed up earlier versions. No denying that, the problems were pointed out during the patch reviewed problem, AND THEY WERE FIXED. Number 2, if you take a look at their latest set of changes (which have still not been accepted), the HAL code is under a pure BSD license (ath5k_hw.c). Other portions are dual licensed, but not the HAL --- if people would only take a look at http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-dev.git;a=tree;f=drivers/net/wireless;h=2d6caeba0924c34b9539960b9ab568ab3d193fc8;hb=everything And yet, the BSD folks seem to continue to nurse the above mantra (which was true, but quickly corrected) combined with the "and the Linux folks aren't listening", which is manifestly not true. We might not agree with everything you are saying, and we might think you're being highly hypocritical, but we are listening. > All the comercial code I have ever seen did not do this stunt of adding a > new copyright and license to barely modified files. Perhaps the "evil" > companies have more ethics or better understanding of copyright. In the original BSD 4.3 code, if I recall correctly, /bin/true was 12 lines of AT&T copyright and the standard "this is proprietary non-published trade secret" legalease with the standard threats of bazillions and bazillions of damage due to AT&T's irreparable harm if the file was ever disclosed.... followed by "exit 0". :-) Personally, I find that issues of copyright are much more easily discussed if people keep a sense of balance and humor. - Ted - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/