Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 158E3C61DA4 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2023 18:29:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231732AbjCOS3N (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Mar 2023 14:29:13 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39800 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230059AbjCOS3K (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Mar 2023 14:29:10 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-x830.google.com (mail-qt1-x830.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::830]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2576F2BED4; Wed, 15 Mar 2023 11:29:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qt1-x830.google.com with SMTP id x1so1500947qtr.7; Wed, 15 Mar 2023 11:29:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1678904947; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=5kzsUfENqklMypk3rlgkphVzQ7vT68BMj3sk6qrsws8=; b=YD9ov6NYByOdc/DoNnoawPb5vi+rp+mpiCOr38jFVMmmzFgkQrf/RZdZyrVQxhVU0S nEzSS86G0GmQ1pJxYpNRrAp5kMhD7BORIzM3QpgpCZpGAj++7l/LBTcS7OOKIqaOnRii h1b/MU5B5Yv+CMqHQhxwAm12fbCIlOoQmVNX27QkUH4F+Zwovn5yWl8kEQ7odlOv+8fo DFw0f+W6DxhqTLcCnTjQsesvI21I/zzME41P/MJXPXk43LHpMpQ1CEJ0TAjqEEwU0xiA r5TWub55fVYhSKTUPdAtL01AnEQ96aCDpowwUsdi/FFhxd6xxAncmh/22RUNjaD4Soyi fvZg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1678904947; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=5kzsUfENqklMypk3rlgkphVzQ7vT68BMj3sk6qrsws8=; b=7x+KSRDl/m2vD3JpujcZ4iNFPsIo9wS4rgIRGIwtpOZ2FC5EBvsKWV5P76josKIT7T zCiilf0hhO+0AdQ125qimU0PRZHZ2PKAyb3LwBNv4KJqqfrA8jvdzLvRlmYT+kyvfSE8 SoaeLQFEvQfcbCPkRGQZX8g086ImUl9GDAZjtjnbcGiFbBNxfZtK2WKQEPdPaKzXqo25 f+qTpwzqvCZ9fw5LRYHa1PLflsrOO6atcsqVudAl4cozhSwQV4tz8BCzH/A9bJh9g8fm cVLi2sBwxrUAVZRi981EQjRSMPwuaBVSxXy2Bq0MpZuTubfCjjg3Fz+Z0qHjnx1n0MX3 yCIQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKUTiESV+7oqu6e9gN7WiGhrJkfsWnB1XNtwW6BNG0qX0eSclmRY lv0wT/Xk25NT3x2BdxFDLBw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set8kiZVc0pCyC2w42NxdgsDntWFtwUrzV+DCpdLI1iFxWPgxNqbeQ5HzxJjLs/EOvFw3MhB5sg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:144e:b0:3bf:e415:5cc3 with SMTP id v14-20020a05622a144e00b003bfe4155cc3mr1261916qtx.58.1678904947200; Wed, 15 Mar 2023 11:29:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.67.48.245] ([192.19.223.252]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 17-20020ac85951000000b003b9a426d626sm4321789qtz.22.2023.03.15.11.29.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 15 Mar 2023 11:29:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 11:29:02 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.7.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: dsa: b53: mmap: fix device tree support Content-Language: en-US To: Jakub Kicinski , =?UTF-8?Q?=c3=81lvaro_Fern=c3=a1ndez_Rojas?= Cc: jonas.gorski@gmail.com, andrew@lunn.ch, olteanv@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20230310121059.4498-1-noltari@gmail.com> <20230315000657.1ab9d9f4@kernel.org> From: Florian Fainelli In-Reply-To: <20230315000657.1ab9d9f4@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 3/15/23 00:06, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 13:10:59 +0100 Álvaro Fernández Rojas wrote: >> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_mmap.c b/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_mmap.c >> index e968322dfbf0..24ea2e19dfa6 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_mmap.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_mmap.c >> @@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ static int b53_mmap_probe_of(struct platform_device *pdev, >> if (of_property_read_u32(of_port, "reg", ®)) >> continue; >> >> - if (reg < B53_CPU_PORT) >> + if (reg <= B53_CPU_PORT) >> pdata->enabled_ports |= BIT(reg); > > Should we switch to B53_N_PORTS instead? > That's the bound used by the local "for each port" macro: > > #define b53_for_each_port(dev, i) \ > for (i = 0; i < B53_N_PORTS; i++) \ > if (dev->enabled_ports & BIT(i)) Yes, checking against B53_N_PORTS would be a better check. -- Florian