Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F5CCC6FD1D for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2023 20:59:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232573AbjCOU7q (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Mar 2023 16:59:46 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59028 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232383AbjCOU7l (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Mar 2023 16:59:41 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC21D85A4F; Wed, 15 Mar 2023 13:59:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1678913979; x=1710449979; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Qbu9sl+61RQBLYcvTOuWSLXfqQGA99BUZPMWL8q3o7A=; b=lARoTfPD6xxYDl6LO3fEqXvXoTLr8sH7fGhOmtELD+/tr0Oy+GuVPvB6 dRqPrCtT4pvIdKxiS+v8wEvnfmK6KlW07Th/DDkvktzs9TVBAXB8a1PlI DtR6AmXk3iLs8ZKbpYhtqNfcQOu8fS+BbN97PCgBstdo9eNxRYwzHu4c8 gWCac5inQEANNnj4vEbnZh8DR5u1MLdnF+89BGfJaDoib+FUfJrHGARcV qWULhASca8gevSzpfkHjASrfWfLoagZzaqhSO6dSRlh61KXmPePxs+Mj6 7sKCHQ8p0XsdHYNbxol/Y1Yko6AH2cwHOh67MKH46FRVxUvfweyMPCwvm g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10650"; a="326176506" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.98,262,1673942400"; d="scan'208";a="326176506" Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Mar 2023 13:59:39 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10650"; a="853747215" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.98,262,1673942400"; d="scan'208";a="853747215" Received: from rchatre-ws.ostc.intel.com ([10.54.69.144]) by orsmga005-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Mar 2023 13:59:38 -0700 From: Reinette Chatre To: jgg@nvidia.com, yishaih@nvidia.com, shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, kevin.tian@intel.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, darwi@linutronix.de, kvm@vger.kernel.org, dave.jiang@intel.com, jing2.liu@intel.com, ashok.raj@intel.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com, tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com, reinette.chatre@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [RFC PATCH 2/8] vfio/pci: Remove negative check on unsigned vector Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 13:59:22 -0700 Message-Id: <97b2809a7d786583233a07b56c42e220d1d6e5a7.1678911529.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org User space provides the vector as an unsigned int that is checked early for validity (vfio_set_irqs_validate_and_prepare()). A later negative check of the provided vector is not necessary. Remove the negative check and ensure the type used for the vector is consistent as an unsigned int. Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre --- drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c | 11 ++++++----- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c index 6a9c6a143cc3..3f64ccdce69f 100644 --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c @@ -317,14 +317,14 @@ static int vfio_msi_enable(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, int nvec, bool msi } static int vfio_msi_set_vector_signal(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, - int vector, int fd, bool msix) + unsigned int vector, int fd, bool msix) { struct pci_dev *pdev = vdev->pdev; struct eventfd_ctx *trigger; int irq, ret; u16 cmd; - if (vector < 0 || vector >= vdev->num_ctx) + if (vector >= vdev->num_ctx) return -EINVAL; irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector); @@ -399,7 +399,8 @@ static int vfio_msi_set_vector_signal(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, static int vfio_msi_set_block(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, unsigned start, unsigned count, int32_t *fds, bool msix) { - int i, j, ret = 0; + int i, ret = 0; + unsigned int j; if (start >= vdev->num_ctx || start + count > vdev->num_ctx) return -EINVAL; @@ -420,7 +421,7 @@ static int vfio_msi_set_block(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, unsigned start, static void vfio_msi_disable(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, bool msix) { struct pci_dev *pdev = vdev->pdev; - int i; + unsigned int i; u16 cmd; for (i = 0; i < vdev->num_ctx; i++) { @@ -542,7 +543,7 @@ static int vfio_pci_set_msi_trigger(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, unsigned index, unsigned start, unsigned count, uint32_t flags, void *data) { - int i; + unsigned int i; bool msix = (index == VFIO_PCI_MSIX_IRQ_INDEX) ? true : false; if (irq_is(vdev, index) && !count && (flags & VFIO_IRQ_SET_DATA_NONE)) { -- 2.34.1