Sender: Guenter Roeck <groeck7@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <19097c39-9703-6b7f-6cc4-8a157b00f368@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Wed, 15 Mar 2023 14:58:24 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.7.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] hwmon: (nct6775) update ASUS WMI monitoring list
 A520/B360/B460/B550...
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Denis Pauk <pauk.denis@gmail.com>
Cc:     jdelvare@suse.com, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mischief@offblast.org,
        de99like@mennucci.debian.net, holger.kiehl@dwd.de
References: <20230315210135.2155-1-pauk.denis@gmail.com>
 <20230315210135.2155-2-pauk.denis@gmail.com>
 <20230315233054.5ac21db0@gmail.com>
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
In-Reply-To: <20230315233054.5ac21db0@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 3/15/23 14:30, Denis Pauk wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 23:01:35 +0200
> Denis Pauk <pauk.denis@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Tested-by: Holger Kiehl <holger.kiehl@dwd.de>
> 
> Pro A520M-C II/CSM is also tested by Holger Kiehl
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-hwmon/patch/868bdc4f-9d45-475c-963e-f5232a8b95@praktifix.dwd.de/
> 
> Could it be applied as single patch or need to rebase over "Pro A520M-C II"
> patch?
> 
Sorry, I don't understand what you are trying to say. I just applied all patches
in sequence as received, with no conflicts. Should I undo that ?

Guenter