Date:   Thu, 16 Mar 2023 00:04:53 +0200
From:   Denis Pauk <pauk.denis@gmail.com>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc:     jdelvare@suse.com, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mischief@offblast.org,
        de99like@mennucci.debian.net, holger.kiehl@dwd.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] hwmon: (nct6775) update ASUS WMI monitoring list
 A520/B360/B460/B550...
Message-ID: <20230316000453.553bf6a8@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <19097c39-9703-6b7f-6cc4-8a157b00f368@roeck-us.net>
References: <20230315210135.2155-1-pauk.denis@gmail.com>
        <20230315210135.2155-2-pauk.denis@gmail.com>
        <20230315233054.5ac21db0@gmail.com>
        <19097c39-9703-6b7f-6cc4-8a157b00f368@roeck-us.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 14:58:24 -0700
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:

> On 3/15/23 14:30, Denis Pauk wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 23:01:35 +0200
> > Denis Pauk <pauk.denis@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Tested-by: Holger Kiehl <holger.kiehl@dwd.de>
> > 
> > Pro A520M-C II/CSM is also tested by Holger Kiehl
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-hwmon/patch/868bdc4f-9d45-475c-963e-f5232a8b95@praktifix.dwd.de/
> > 
> > Could it be applied as single patch or need to rebase over "Pro A520M-C II"
> > patch?
> >   
> Sorry, I don't understand what you are trying to say. I just applied all
> patches in sequence as received, with no conflicts. Should I undo that ?
> 
> Guenter
> 

No, Thank you!

I just like to mention that Holger Kiehl sent separate patch with
"Pro A520M-C II" support and it could create conflicts. I have found it only
when I have sent my patches.