Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5322FC7618A for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2023 22:18:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232502AbjCOWSD (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Mar 2023 18:18:03 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58056 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232358AbjCOWSA (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Mar 2023 18:18:00 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x132.google.com (mail-lf1-x132.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::132]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60366211F; Wed, 15 Mar 2023 15:17:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x132.google.com with SMTP id y15so16633862lfa.7; Wed, 15 Mar 2023 15:17:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1678918677; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=ohh0sNko5t8OAsphcRpCNrGFt9h2wrYQQBp+YtBOx6U=; b=ZziAGsDMwqsRuMQZvA11+qbBfioHGZMUCMGfFrWn9YcgZAJPvqZwZ6w9idxuJ1Y1RZ 1MhT5b6r8MMgeTVzce+FpNcVFjB+YwJ7yfWptNkk24e6ZMhiiqH3jx3xDHX8/6eOeHPm WmIraLRFkw7RixwZpiMvRyPW3OfYh/RmIPjOouOIGlWDOjMz9ngojtQdSal0ZKtamiCs kvOHjzUcbQqS0psZjHp+gstc57RdE3PNJzTBEt2rgHzV9H2lEnbUXvmfRVnLmPR21tt9 7CyLUKgxSp9bJXaEi/wVi3EZh8H7YotOb7an/UFtjBbrKDT+gOfAnMzDL9+lpV3+V/Bt ZY9g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1678918677; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ohh0sNko5t8OAsphcRpCNrGFt9h2wrYQQBp+YtBOx6U=; b=8CHKjoalAvOIGkkABxEGtffHt+6nU5hwrRCTiCW2PYB9CNIqVlt6gJLXJ6qbIzmFQv I8GTK6nV6TF7uBgPXhLRpBvio/Va8QFmmKmUpgPD+D2LXAO5+MhHrg9UkWPHKjBz5vKX +xEMzWlvtDZbJuXKD+0tJNh2XSYr9i/UkNeT8oMcdqvpQxdW1gpJGOEByyB9R4U2Tez2 x09ZFSAGhN6LSV/9MfmIjFoAgK9cKC5dEiK9KMrc8rqFsMFLc9bVmiHazc/ZtC1jbo5O zB/jpML+dduIQBBGLmHqSwGPQT5McrBLjzDrKcSbAvU+9T6xa3yf6AhlnUrrELXouVEG tiWQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKWpnrRAIFHImxs8qvrdpSAM3G06Dd22tfX9f8fuI0v+VCgzwS69 1JMUTwvI4surGpM8Z0HoQE8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set8egnxWqeQOwdnQervf5UH/p6hmFz0ct3UOIP5lYa5zmJS3YvP8Yr1kRxodIC21cfY6bRo6xA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3910:b0:4dd:af74:acef with SMTP id a16-20020a056512391000b004ddaf74acefmr2157265lfu.35.1678918677485; Wed, 15 Mar 2023 15:17:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([46.211.236.75]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m3-20020ac24243000000b004d291dcee7fsm978044lfl.55.2023.03.15.15.17.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 15 Mar 2023 15:17:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 00:17:49 +0200 From: Denis Pauk To: Guenter Roeck Cc: jdelvare@suse.com, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mischief@offblast.org, de99like@mennucci.debian.net, holger.kiehl@dwd.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] hwmon: (nct6775) update ASUS WMI monitoring list A520/B360/B460/B550... Message-ID: <20230316001749.44e51d08@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20230316000453.553bf6a8@gmail.com> References: <20230315210135.2155-1-pauk.denis@gmail.com> <20230315210135.2155-2-pauk.denis@gmail.com> <20230315233054.5ac21db0@gmail.com> <19097c39-9703-6b7f-6cc4-8a157b00f368@roeck-us.net> <20230316000453.553bf6a8@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.37; aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 00:04:53 +0200 Denis Pauk wrote: > On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 14:58:24 -0700 > Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > On 3/15/23 14:30, Denis Pauk wrote: > > > On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 23:01:35 +0200 > > > Denis Pauk wrote: > > > > > > Tested-by: Holger Kiehl > > > > > > Pro A520M-C II/CSM is also tested by Holger Kiehl > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-hwmon/patch/868bdc4f-9d45-475c-963e-f5232a8b95@praktifix.dwd.de/ > > > > > > Could it be applied as single patch or need to rebase over "Pro A520M-C > > > II" patch? > > > > > Sorry, I don't understand what you are trying to say. I just applied all > > patches in sequence as received, with no conflicts. Should I undo that ? > > > > Guenter > > > > No, Thank you! > > I just like to mention that Holger Kiehl sent separate patch with > "Pro A520M-C II" support and it could create conflicts. I have found it only > when I have sent my patches. > I have rechecked repo and "Pro A520M-C II" is added twice after apply both of patches (my and from Holger Kiehl), could you please remove one of mention of it?