Date:   Thu, 16 Mar 2023 09:39:48 +0100
From:   Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
To:     Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        kvm@vger.kernel.org, jjherne@linux.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com,
        alex.williamson@redhat.com, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390/vfio_ap: fix memory leak in vfio_ap device driver
Message-ID: <ZBLV1P2AkWdHht2r@osiris>
References: <20230315153932.165031-1-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230315153932.165031-1-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 11:39:32AM -0400, Tony Krowiak wrote:
> The device release callback function invoked to release the matrix device
> uses the dev_get_drvdata(device *dev) function to retrieve the
> pointer to the vfio_matrix_dev object in order to free its storage. The
> problem is, this object is not stored as drvdata with the device; since the
> kfree function will accept a NULL pointer, the memory for the
> vfio_matrix_dev object is never freed.
> 
> Since the device being released is contained within the vfio_matrix_dev
> object, the container_of macro will be used to retrieve its pointer.
> 
> Fixes: 1fde573413b5 ("s390: vfio-ap: base implementation of VFIO AP device driver")
> Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c
> index 997b524bdd2b..15e9de9f4574 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c
> @@ -54,8 +54,9 @@ static struct ap_driver vfio_ap_drv = {
>  
>  static void vfio_ap_matrix_dev_release(struct device *dev)
>  {
> -	struct ap_matrix_dev *matrix_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> -
> +	struct ap_matrix_dev *matrix_dev = container_of(dev,
> +							struct ap_matrix_dev,
> +							device);
>  	kfree(matrix_dev);

Could you keep this code more readable, including adding the missing
blank line after the declaration, please? Something like:

static void vfio_ap_matrix_dev_release(struct device *dev)
{
	struct ap_matrix_dev *matrix_dev;

	matrix_dev = container_of(dev, struct ap_matrix_dev, device);
	kfree(matrix_dev);
}

Thanks!