Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757361AbXIQXrs (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:47:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755326AbXIQXrl (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:47:41 -0400 Received: from THUNK.ORG ([69.25.196.29]:57101 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755203AbXIQXrk (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:47:40 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:47:26 -0400 From: Theodore Tso To: "Can E. Acar" Cc: Claudio Jeker , Adrian Bunk , misc@openbsd.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Hazelton , Eben Moglen , Lawrence Lessig , "Bradley M. Kuhn" , Matt Norwood Subject: Re: Wasting our Freedom Message-ID: <20070917234726.GG18360@thunk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Theodore Tso , "Can E. Acar" , Claudio Jeker , Adrian Bunk , misc@openbsd.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Hazelton , Eben Moglen , Lawrence Lessig , "Bradley M. Kuhn" , Matt Norwood References: <46ED7A8F.1020304@pro-g.com.tr> <20070916195909.GA18232@stusta.de> <20070916203926.GA17863@schlund.de> <20070916211208.GC5502@thunk.org> <20070917125554.GB13179@diehard.n-r-g.com> <20070917133458.GA18360@thunk.org> <20070917192341.GB30119@diehard.n-r-g.com> <20070917204318.GE18360@thunk.org> <46EEFA6D.9080708@pro-g.com.tr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46EEFA6D.9080708@pro-g.com.tr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on thunker.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1711 Lines: 36 On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 03:06:37PM -0700, Can E. Acar wrote: > The only remaining issue is whether Nick & Jiri have enough > original contributions to the code to be added to the Copyright. > > I believe this needs to be resolved between Reyk and Nick and Jiri. > > The main reason of Theo's message, linked earlier, was the > lack of response on this issue. It seems that the SFLC is > dismissing this issue, and thus stalling its resolution by the > developers. OK, so all of this flaming, and digging up of "licenses ripped off", and chaff thrown up in the air, and moaning and bewailing about "theft", is now down to these two lines regarding Nick and Jiri: > * Copyright (c) 2004-2007 Reyk Floeter > * Copyright (c) 2006-2007 Nick Kossifidis > * Copyright (c) 2007 Jiri Slaby > [snip rest of BSD license] It's under a BSD license; what material difference does those two lines make, for goodness sake? It's under a BSD license, so it's not like anything won't be "given back". Whether or not they have made enough for changes is really a question for the lawyers, and may differ from one jurisdiction to another --- but whether or not they have now, or maybe will not make until later --- does it really make a difference? Who gets hurt if someone gets they get a bit more credit than they deserve? Certainly the most important thing is that Reyk is given proper credit, right? - Ted - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/