Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755944AbXIRJZZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Sep 2007 05:25:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754253AbXIRJZM (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Sep 2007 05:25:12 -0400 Received: from gate.solvo.ru ([195.201.44.254]:57105 "EHLO gate.solvo.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753415AbXIRJZL (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Sep 2007 05:25:11 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 809 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 05:25:10 EDT Message-ID: <46EF962E.9010706@solvo.ru> Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 13:11:10 +0400 From: Sergey Tikhonov User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linux on Alpha processors Cc: Adrian Bunk , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru, ac-admin@lists.anotherbloody.com, Jay Estabrook Subject: Re: 2.6.23 alpha unistd.h changes References: <46EEE483.4020209@linux-kernel.at> <20070917212257.GA27980@stusta.de> <46EF922A.4030206@linux-kernel.at> In-Reply-To: <46EF922A.4030206@linux-kernel.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: gate.solvo.ru; Sender-ip: 172.16.80.12; Sender-helo: tiger.solvo.ru;) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1370 Lines: 41 Oliver Falk wrote: > On 09/17/2007 11:22 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 10:33:07PM +0200, Oliver Falk wrote: >> >>> At Alphacore we used to patch the kernel headers for a while now; We >>> added syscalls __NR_openat (447) until __NR_tee (466). >>> >> Why did your numbers differ from the numbers that were used in the >> upstream kernel? >> > > Afaik, our patch was done a while ago and nobody every submitted it > upstream - don't know why... > Yes, it was done by me and I had no info how to push the updates to upstream, sorry. (by that time, there were no latest "distribution" available with those changes). > At AC, we follow RH/Fedora packages and there we had glibc-kernheaders - > where our patch originates. When the glibc/kernel packages changed and > glibc-kernheaders died, I patched the syscalls into kernel headers; Not > thinking that I better submit it upstream. :-( > Yea, now there is more interest and it is better to do it right. :) Regards, -- Sergey Tikhonov Head, R&D department Solvo Ltd. Saint-Petersburg, Russia http://www.solvo.ru tsv@solvo.ru - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/