Date:   Fri, 17 Mar 2023 16:43:49 +0200
From:   Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
To:     Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>,
        Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Cc:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
        Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>,
        Liam Beguin <liambeguin@gmail.com>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 5/8] iio: test: test gain-time-scale helpers
Message-ID: <31cf5765078b2d808d9e66eb623cde70ee6478ac.1679062529.git.mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
References: <cover.1679062529.git.mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nUGCChdBJfJDzt00"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <cover.1679062529.git.mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk


--nUGCChdBJfJDzt00
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Some light sensors can adjust both the HW-gain and integration time.
There are cases where adjusting the integration time has similar impact
to the scale of the reported values as gain setting has.

IIO users do typically expect to handle scale by a single writable 'scale'
entry. Driver should then adjust the gain/time accordingly.

It however is difficult for a driver to know whether it should change
gain or integration time to meet the requested scale. Usually it is
preferred to have longer integration time which usually improves
accuracy, but there may be use-cases where long measurement times can be
an issue. Thus it can be preferable to allow also changing the
integration time - but mitigate the scale impact by also changing the gain
underneath. Eg, if integration time change doubles the measured values,
the driver can reduce the HW-gain to half.

The theory of the computations of gain-time-scale is simple. However,
some people (undersigned) got that implemented wrong for more than once.
Hence some gain-time-scale helpers were introduced.

Add some simple tests to verify the most hairy functions.

Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>

---
Changes:
v3 =3D> v4:
- use dummy device to test devm interfaces
- adapt to the new header location
- drop tests for dropped interfaces

v2 =3D> v3:
- Use namespace for iio-gts-helpers

RFCv1 =3D> v2:
- add tests for available scales/times helpers
- adapt to renamed iio-gts-helpers.h header
---
 drivers/iio/test/Kconfig        |  16 ++
 drivers/iio/test/Makefile       |   1 +
 drivers/iio/test/iio-test-gts.c | 461 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 478 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/iio/test/iio-test-gts.c

diff --git a/drivers/iio/test/Kconfig b/drivers/iio/test/Kconfig
index 0b6e4e278a2f..4d5cfb9fe60b 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/test/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/iio/test/Kconfig
@@ -4,6 +4,20 @@
 #
=20
 # Keep in alphabetical order
+config IIO_GTS_KUNIT_TEST
+	tristate "Test IIO formatting functions" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+	depends on KUNIT
+	select IIO_GTS_HELPER
+	select TEST_KUNIT_DEVICE_HELPERS
+	default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+	help
+	  build unit tests for the IIO light sensor gain-time-scale helpers.
+
+	  For more information on KUnit and unit tests in general, please refer
+	  to the KUnit documentation in Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/.
+
+	  If unsure, say N. Keep in alphabetical order
+
 config IIO_RESCALE_KUNIT_TEST
 	tristate "Test IIO rescale conversion functions" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
 	depends on KUNIT && IIO_RESCALE
@@ -27,3 +41,5 @@ config IIO_FORMAT_KUNIT_TEST
 	  to the KUnit documentation in Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/.
=20
 	  If unsure, say N.
+
+
diff --git a/drivers/iio/test/Makefile b/drivers/iio/test/Makefile
index d76eaf36da82..e9a4cf1ff57f 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/test/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/iio/test/Makefile
@@ -6,4 +6,5 @@
 # Keep in alphabetical order
 obj-$(CONFIG_IIO_RESCALE_KUNIT_TEST) +=3D iio-test-rescale.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_IIO_FORMAT_KUNIT_TEST) +=3D iio-test-format.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_IIO_GTS_KUNIT_TEST) +=3D iio-test-gts.o
 CFLAGS_iio-test-format.o +=3D $(DISABLE_STRUCTLEAK_PLUGIN)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/test/iio-test-gts.c b/drivers/iio/test/iio-test-gt=
s.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..ff9311acd0bb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/iio/test/iio-test-gts.c
@@ -0,0 +1,461 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/* Unit tests for IIO light sensor gain-time-scale helpers
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2023 Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
+ */
+
+#include <kunit/platform_device.h>
+#include <kunit/test.h>
+#include <linux/iio/iio-gts-helper.h>
+#include <linux/iio/types.h>
+
+/*
+ * Please, read the "rant" from the top of the lib/test_linear_ranges.c if
+ * you see a line of helper code which is not being tested.
+ *
+ * Then, please look at the line which is not being tested. Is this line
+ * somehow unusually complex? If answer is "no", then chances are that the
+ * "development inertia" caused by adding a test exceeds the benefits.
+ *
+ * If yes, then adding a test is probably a good idea but please stop for a
+ * moment and consider the effort of changing all the tests when code gets
+ * refactored. Eventually it neeeds to be.
+ */
+
+#define TEST_TSEL_50		1
+#define TEST_TSEL_X_MIN		TEST_TSEL_50
+#define TEST_TSEL_100		0
+#define TEST_TSEL_200		2
+#define TEST_TSEL_400		4
+#define TEST_TSEL_X_MAX		TEST_TSEL_400
+
+#define TEST_GSEL_1		0x00
+#define TEST_GSEL_X_MIN		TEST_GSEL_1
+#define TEST_GSEL_4		0x08
+#define TEST_GSEL_16		0x0a
+#define TEST_GSEL_32		0x0b
+#define TEST_GSEL_64		0x0c
+#define TEST_GSEL_256		0x18
+#define TEST_GSEL_512		0x19
+#define TEST_GSEL_1024		0x1a
+#define TEST_GSEL_2048		0x1b
+#define TEST_GSEL_4096		0x1c
+#define TEST_GSEL_X_MAX		TEST_GSEL_4096
+
+#define TEST_SCALE_1X		64
+#define TEST_SCALE_MIN_X	TEST_SCALE_1X
+#define TEST_SCALE_2X		32
+#define TEST_SCALE_4X		16
+#define TEST_SCALE_8X		8
+#define TEST_SCALE_16X		4
+#define TEST_SCALE_32X		2
+#define TEST_SCALE_64X		1
+
+#define TEST_SCALE_NANO_128X	500000000
+#define TEST_SCALE_NANO_256X	250000000
+#define TEST_SCALE_NANO_512X	125000000
+#define TEST_SCALE_NANO_1024X	62500000
+#define TEST_SCALE_NANO_2048X	31250000
+#define TEST_SCALE_NANO_4096X	15625000
+#define TEST_SCALE_NANO_4096X2	7812500
+#define TEST_SCALE_NANO_4096X4	3906250
+#define TEST_SCALE_NANO_4096X8	1953125
+
+#define TEST_SCALE_NANO_MAX_X TEST_SCALE_NANO_4096X8
+
+static const struct iio_gain_sel_pair gts_test_gains[] =3D {
+	GAIN_SCALE_GAIN(1, TEST_GSEL_1),
+	GAIN_SCALE_GAIN(4, TEST_GSEL_4),
+	GAIN_SCALE_GAIN(16, TEST_GSEL_16),
+	GAIN_SCALE_GAIN(32, TEST_GSEL_32),
+	GAIN_SCALE_GAIN(64, TEST_GSEL_64),
+	GAIN_SCALE_GAIN(256, TEST_GSEL_256),
+	GAIN_SCALE_GAIN(512, TEST_GSEL_512),
+	GAIN_SCALE_GAIN(1024, TEST_GSEL_1024),
+	GAIN_SCALE_GAIN(2048, TEST_GSEL_2048),
+	GAIN_SCALE_GAIN(4096, TEST_GSEL_4096),
+#define HWGAIN_MAX 4096
+};
+
+static const struct iio_itime_sel_mul gts_test_itimes[] =3D {
+	GAIN_SCALE_ITIME_US(400 * 1000, TEST_TSEL_400, 8),
+	GAIN_SCALE_ITIME_US(200 * 1000, TEST_TSEL_200, 4),
+	GAIN_SCALE_ITIME_US(100 * 1000, TEST_TSEL_100, 2),
+	GAIN_SCALE_ITIME_US(50 * 1000, TEST_TSEL_50, 1),
+#define TIMEGAIN_MAX 8
+};
+#define TOTAL_GAIN_MAX	(HWGAIN_MAX * TIMEGAIN_MAX)
+
+static int test_init_iio_gain_scale(struct iio_gts *gts, int max_scale_int,
+				int max_scale_nano)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret =3D iio_init_iio_gts(max_scale_int, max_scale_nano, gts_test_gains,
+			       ARRAY_SIZE(gts_test_gains), gts_test_itimes,
+			       ARRAY_SIZE(gts_test_itimes), gts);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static void test_iio_gts_find_gain_for_scale_using_time(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct iio_gts gts;
+	int ret, gain_sel;
+
+	ret =3D test_init_iio_gain_scale(&gts, TEST_SCALE_1X, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+	if (ret)
+		return;
+
+	ret =3D iio_gts_find_gain_sel_for_scale_using_time(&gts, TEST_TSEL_100,
+						TEST_SCALE_8X, 0, &gain_sel);
+	/*
+	 * Meas time 100 =3D> gain by time 2x
+	 * TEST_SCALE_8X matches total gain 8x
+	 * =3D> required HWGAIN 4x
+	 */
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, TEST_GSEL_4, gain_sel);
+
+	ret =3D iio_gts_find_gain_sel_for_scale_using_time(&gts, TEST_TSEL_200, 0,
+						TEST_SCALE_NANO_256X, &gain_sel);
+	/*
+	 * Meas time 200 =3D> gain by time 4x
+	 * TEST_SCALE_256X matches total gain 256x
+	 * =3D> required HWGAIN 256/4 =3D> 64x
+	 */
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, TEST_GSEL_64, gain_sel);
+
+	/* Min time, Min gain */
+	ret =3D iio_gts_find_gain_sel_for_scale_using_time(&gts, TEST_TSEL_X_MIN,
+						TEST_SCALE_MIN_X, 0, &gain_sel);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, TEST_GSEL_1, gain_sel);
+
+	/* Max time, Max gain */
+	ret =3D iio_gts_find_gain_sel_for_scale_using_time(&gts, TEST_TSEL_X_MAX,
+					0, TEST_SCALE_NANO_MAX_X, &gain_sel);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, TEST_GSEL_4096, gain_sel);
+
+	ret =3D iio_gts_find_gain_sel_for_scale_using_time(&gts, TEST_TSEL_100, 0,
+						TEST_SCALE_NANO_256X, &gain_sel);
+	/*
+	 * Meas time 100 =3D> gain by time 2x
+	 * TEST_SCALE_256X matches total gain 256x
+	 * =3D> required HWGAIN 256/2 =3D> 128x (not in gain-table - unsupported)
+	 */
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, 0, ret);
+
+	ret =3D iio_gts_find_gain_sel_for_scale_using_time(&gts, TEST_TSEL_200, 0,
+						TEST_SCALE_NANO_MAX_X, &gain_sel);
+	/* We can't reach the max gain with integration time smaller than MAX */
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, 0, ret);
+
+	ret =3D iio_gts_find_gain_sel_for_scale_using_time(&gts, TEST_TSEL_50, 0,
+						TEST_SCALE_NANO_MAX_X, &gain_sel);
+	/* We can't reach the max gain with integration time smaller than MAX */
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, 0, ret);
+}
+
+static void test_iio_gts_find_new_gain_sel_by_old_gain_time(struct kunit *=
test)
+{
+	struct iio_gts gts;
+	int ret, old_gain, new_gain, old_time_sel, new_time_sel;
+
+	ret =3D test_init_iio_gain_scale(&gts, TEST_SCALE_1X, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+	if (ret)
+		return;
+
+	old_gain =3D 32;
+	old_time_sel =3D TEST_TSEL_200;
+	new_time_sel =3D TEST_TSEL_400;
+
+	ret =3D iio_gts_find_new_gain_sel_by_old_gain_time(&gts, old_gain,
+					old_time_sel, new_time_sel, &new_gain);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+	/*
+	 * Doubling the integration time doubles the total gain - so old
+	 * (hw)gain must be divided by two to compensate. =3D> 32 / 2 =3D> 16
+	 */
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 16, new_gain);
+
+	old_gain =3D 4;
+	old_time_sel =3D TEST_TSEL_50;
+	new_time_sel =3D TEST_TSEL_200;
+	ret =3D iio_gts_find_new_gain_sel_by_old_gain_time(&gts, old_gain,
+					old_time_sel, new_time_sel, &new_gain);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+	/*
+	 * gain by time 1x =3D> 4x - (hw)gain 4x =3D> 1x
+	 */
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1, new_gain);
+
+	old_gain =3D 512;
+	old_time_sel =3D TEST_TSEL_400;
+	new_time_sel =3D TEST_TSEL_50;
+	ret =3D iio_gts_find_new_gain_sel_by_old_gain_time(&gts, old_gain,
+					old_time_sel, new_time_sel, &new_gain);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+	/*
+	 * gain by time 8x =3D> 1x - (hw)gain 512x =3D> 4096x)
+	 */
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 4096, new_gain);
+
+	/* Unsupported gain 2x */
+	old_gain =3D 4;
+	old_time_sel =3D TEST_TSEL_200;
+	new_time_sel =3D TEST_TSEL_400;
+	ret =3D iio_gts_find_new_gain_sel_by_old_gain_time(&gts, old_gain,
+					old_time_sel, new_time_sel, &new_gain);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, 0, ret);
+
+	/* Too small gain */
+	old_gain =3D 4;
+	old_time_sel =3D TEST_TSEL_50;
+	new_time_sel =3D TEST_TSEL_400;
+	ret =3D iio_gts_find_new_gain_sel_by_old_gain_time(&gts, old_gain,
+					old_time_sel, new_time_sel, &new_gain);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, 0, ret);
+
+	/* Too big gain */
+	old_gain =3D 1024;
+	old_time_sel =3D TEST_TSEL_400;
+	new_time_sel =3D TEST_TSEL_50;
+	ret =3D iio_gts_find_new_gain_sel_by_old_gain_time(&gts, old_gain,
+					old_time_sel, new_time_sel, &new_gain);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, 0, ret);
+}
+
+static void test_iio_find_closest_gain_low(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct iio_gts gts;
+	bool in_range;
+	int ret;
+
+	const struct iio_gain_sel_pair gts_test_gains_gain_low[] =3D {
+		GAIN_SCALE_GAIN(4, TEST_GSEL_4),
+		GAIN_SCALE_GAIN(16, TEST_GSEL_16),
+		GAIN_SCALE_GAIN(32, TEST_GSEL_32),
+	};
+
+	ret =3D test_init_iio_gain_scale(&gts, TEST_SCALE_1X, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+	if (ret)
+		return;
+
+	ret =3D iio_find_closest_gain_low(&gts, 2, &in_range);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1, ret);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, true, in_range);
+
+	ret =3D iio_find_closest_gain_low(&gts, 1, &in_range);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1, ret);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, true, in_range);
+
+	ret =3D iio_find_closest_gain_low(&gts, 4095, &in_range);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 2048, ret);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, true, in_range);
+
+	ret =3D iio_find_closest_gain_low(&gts, 4097, &in_range);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 4096, ret);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, false, in_range);
+
+	ret =3D iio_init_iio_gts(TEST_SCALE_1X, 0, gts_test_gains_gain_low,
+			       ARRAY_SIZE(gts_test_gains_gain_low),
+			       gts_test_itimes, ARRAY_SIZE(gts_test_itimes),
+			       &gts);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+	if (ret)
+		return;
+
+	ret =3D iio_find_closest_gain_low(&gts, 3, &in_range);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -EINVAL, ret);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, false, in_range);
+}
+
+static void test_iio_gts_total_gain_to_scale(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct iio_gts gts;
+	int ret, scale_int, scale_nano;
+
+	ret =3D test_init_iio_gain_scale(&gts, TEST_SCALE_1X, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+	if (ret)
+		return;
+
+	ret =3D iio_gts_total_gain_to_scale(&gts, 1, &scale_int, &scale_nano);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, TEST_SCALE_1X, scale_int);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, scale_nano);
+
+	ret =3D iio_gts_total_gain_to_scale(&gts, 1, &scale_int, &scale_nano);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, TEST_SCALE_1X, scale_int);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, scale_nano);
+
+	ret =3D iio_gts_total_gain_to_scale(&gts, 4096 * 8, &scale_int,
+					  &scale_nano);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, scale_int);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, TEST_SCALE_NANO_4096X8, scale_nano);
+}
+
+static void test_iio_gts_chk_times(struct kunit *test, const int *vals)
+{
+	static const int expected[] =3D {50000, 100000, 200000, 400000};
+	int i;
+
+	for (i =3D 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(expected); i++)
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, expected[i], vals[i]);
+}
+
+static void test_iio_gts_chk_scales_all(struct kunit *test, struct iio_gts=
 *gts,
+					const int *vals, int len)
+{
+	static const int gains[] =3D {1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512,
+				    1024, 2048, 4096, 4096 * 2, 4096 * 4,
+				    4096 * 8};
+
+	int expected[ARRAY_SIZE(gains) * 2];
+	int i, ret;
+	int exp_len =3D ARRAY_SIZE(gains) * 2;
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, exp_len, len);
+	if (len !=3D exp_len)
+		return;
+
+	for (i =3D 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(gains); i++) {
+		ret =3D iio_gts_total_gain_to_scale(gts, gains[i],
+						  &expected[2 * i],
+						  &expected[2 * i + 1]);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+		if (ret)
+			return;
+	}
+
+	for (i =3D 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(expected); i++)
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, expected[i], vals[i]);
+}
+
+static void test_iio_gts_chk_scales_t200(struct kunit *test, struct iio_gt=
s *gts,
+					 const int *vals, int len)
+{
+	/* The gain caused by time 200 is 4x */
+	static const int gains[] =3D {
+		1 * 4,
+		4 * 4,
+		16 * 4,
+		32 * 4,
+		64 * 4,
+		256 * 4,
+		512 * 4,
+		1024 * 4,
+		2048 * 4,
+		4096 * 4
+	};
+	int expected[ARRAY_SIZE(gains) * 2];
+	int i, ret;
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 2 * ARRAY_SIZE(gains), len);
+	if (len < 2 * ARRAY_SIZE(gains))
+		return;
+
+	for (i =3D 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(gains); i++) {
+		ret =3D iio_gts_total_gain_to_scale(gts, gains[i],
+						  &expected[2 * i],
+						  &expected[2 * i + 1]);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+		if (ret)
+			return;
+	}
+
+	for (i =3D 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(expected); i++)
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, expected[i], vals[i]);
+}
+
+static void test_iio_gts_avail_test(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct iio_gts gts;
+	int ret;
+	int type, len;
+	const int *vals;
+	struct device *dev;
+
+	ret =3D test_init_iio_gain_scale(&gts, TEST_SCALE_1X, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+	if (ret)
+		return;
+
+	dev =3D test_kunit_helper_alloc_device(test);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, dev);
+	if (!dev)
+		return;
+
+	ret =3D devm_iio_gts_build_avail_tables(dev, &gts);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+	if (ret)
+		goto drop_testdev;
+
+	/* test table building for times and iio_gts_avail_times() */
+	ret =3D iio_gts_avail_times(&gts, &vals, &type, &len);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, IIO_AVAIL_LIST, ret);
+	if (ret)
+		goto drop_testdev;
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, IIO_VAL_INT, type);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 4, len);
+	if (len < 4)
+		goto drop_testdev;
+
+	test_iio_gts_chk_times(test, vals);
+
+	/* Test table building for all scales and iio_gts_all_avail_scales() */
+	ret =3D iio_gts_all_avail_scales(&gts, &vals, &type, &len);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, IIO_AVAIL_LIST, ret);
+	if (ret)
+		goto drop_testdev;
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO, type);
+
+	test_iio_gts_chk_scales_all(test, &gts, vals, len);
+
+	/*
+	 * Test table building for scales/time and
+	 * iio_gts_avail_scales_for_time()
+	 */
+	ret =3D iio_gts_avail_scales_for_time(&gts, 200000, &vals, &type, &len);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, IIO_AVAIL_LIST, ret);
+	if (ret)
+		goto drop_testdev;
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO, type);
+	test_iio_gts_chk_scales_t200(test, &gts, vals, len);
+
+drop_testdev:
+	test_kunit_helper_free_device(test, dev);
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case iio_gts_test_cases[] =3D {
+		KUNIT_CASE(test_iio_gts_find_gain_for_scale_using_time),
+		KUNIT_CASE(test_iio_gts_find_new_gain_sel_by_old_gain_time),
+		KUNIT_CASE(test_iio_find_closest_gain_low),
+		KUNIT_CASE(test_iio_gts_total_gain_to_scale),
+		KUNIT_CASE(test_iio_gts_avail_test),
+		{}
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite iio_gts_test_suite =3D {
+	.name =3D "iio-gain-time-scale",
+	.test_cases =3D iio_gts_test_cases,
+};
+
+kunit_test_suite(iio_gts_test_suite);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Test IIO light sensor gain-time-scale helpers");
+MODULE_IMPORT_NS(IIO_GTS_HELPER);
+
--=20
2.39.2


--=20
Matti Vaittinen, Linux device drivers
ROHM Semiconductors, Finland SWDC
Kiviharjunlenkki 1E
90220 OULU
FINLAND

~~~ "I don't think so," said Rene Descartes. Just then he vanished ~~~
Simon says - in Latin please.
~~~ "non cogito me" dixit Rene Descarte, deinde evanescavit ~~~
Thanks to Simon Glass for the translation =3D]=20

--nUGCChdBJfJDzt00
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEIx+f8wZb28fLKEhTeFA3/03aocUFAmQUfKUACgkQeFA3/03a
ocWLBgf8DLA/nkwem0cZM1rFMeUxdl0dzMVVH0Xdf7JhGDbAtgLSlCVcEXYHC2Ru
xxzxbLT1HBLQCwoksSntWKVblJ5kLKvm/Rnf1CeSiOfK+K42vusOCOb0/cv2yNsK
qSpv2A3JlOVjgEHolK40p8pNzTAhLlgaEOiAbzwnLzeenpUKwn3Dbn59HhDYxerV
CJugQR3qMKupVL7I8+gE9qrWU85gIdUFXKcbNWBZgkFY5uSDd4Arxwk+G4OMwfKu
HJpqCLFGDsO7dHD/ItlObQ4l9GjyoZtk6O8clJYGWQPXl/GY/fOEpavwD482odSR
tJ4wJc0Mz1l4VrZbndB5Ato3Mq8ytg==
=kU8X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nUGCChdBJfJDzt00--