From:   Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
To:     pavel@ucw.cz, lee@kernel.org, quic_fenglinw@quicinc.com
Cc:     linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] leds: flash: set varaiables mvflash_3,4ch_regs storage-class-specifier to static
Date:   Fri, 17 Mar 2023 15:13:41 -0400
Message-Id: <20230317191341.1670660-1-trix@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

smatch reports
drivers/leds/flash/leds-qcom-flash.c:103:18: warning:
  symbol 'mvflash_3ch_regs' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/leds/flash/leds-qcom-flash.c:115:18: warning:
  symbol 'mvflash_4ch_regs' was not declared. Should it be static?

These variables are only used in leds-qcom-flash.c,
so it should be static.

Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/leds/flash/leds-qcom-flash.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/leds/flash/leds-qcom-flash.c b/drivers/leds/flash/leds-qcom-flash.c
index 406ed8761c78..90a24fa25a49 100644
--- a/drivers/leds/flash/leds-qcom-flash.c
+++ b/drivers/leds/flash/leds-qcom-flash.c
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ enum {
 	REG_MAX_COUNT,
 };
 
-struct reg_field mvflash_3ch_regs[REG_MAX_COUNT] = {
+static struct reg_field mvflash_3ch_regs[REG_MAX_COUNT] = {
 	REG_FIELD(0x08, 0, 7),			/* status1	*/
 	REG_FIELD(0x09, 0, 7),                  /* status2	*/
 	REG_FIELD(0x0a, 0, 7),                  /* status3	*/
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ struct reg_field mvflash_3ch_regs[REG_MAX_COUNT] = {
 	REG_FIELD(0x4c, 0, 2),                  /* chan_en	*/
 };
 
-struct reg_field mvflash_4ch_regs[REG_MAX_COUNT] = {
+static struct reg_field mvflash_4ch_regs[REG_MAX_COUNT] = {
 	REG_FIELD(0x06, 0, 7),			/* status1	*/
 	REG_FIELD(0x07, 0, 6),			/* status2	*/
 	REG_FIELD(0x09, 0, 7),			/* status3	*/
-- 
2.27.0