Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69762C6FD1D for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2023 23:04:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230201AbjCQXEb (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Mar 2023 19:04:31 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38636 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230182AbjCQXET (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Mar 2023 19:04:19 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 469 seconds by postgrey-1.37 at lindbergh.monkeyblade.net; Fri, 17 Mar 2023 16:03:57 PDT Received: from albireo.enyo.de (albireo.enyo.de [37.24.231.21]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 503DD3AA0; Fri, 17 Mar 2023 16:03:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.17.203.2] (port=47891 helo=deneb.enyo.de) by albireo.enyo.de ([172.17.140.2]) with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) id 1pdIzQ-001qjd-6U; Fri, 17 Mar 2023 22:56:00 +0000 Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1pdIzP-000Qvx-TG; Fri, 17 Mar 2023 23:55:59 +0100 From: Florian Weimer To: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet , Arnd Bergmann , Tony Luck , Jessica Clarke , John Paul Adrian Glaubitz , Matthew Wilcox , Marc Zyngier , Guenter Roeck , Linus Torvalds , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Retire IA64/Itanium support References: <20230215100008.2565237-1-ardb@kernel.org> Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 23:55:59 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20230215100008.2565237-1-ardb@kernel.org> (Ard Biesheuvel's message of "Wed, 15 Feb 2023 11:00:03 +0100") Message-ID: <87y1nvng1s.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Ard Biesheuvel: > The IA64 port of Linux has no maintainer, and according to a report from > its only remaining user [0], it has been broken for a month and nobody > cares. > > Given that keeping a complex but unused architecture alive uses up > valuable developer bandwidth, let's just get rid of it. > > This supersedes my patch proposing to mark it as 'dead', which received > no replies from anyone that wants to keep it alive. [1] Is this still going ahead? In userspace, ia64 is of course full of special cases, too, so many of us really want to see it gone, but we can't really start the removal process while there is still kernel support.