Message-ID: <f21df56b-43b8-a48e-ab8f-e0cf2b163976@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 18 Mar 2023 11:07:07 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.9.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] Introduce Nuvoton ma35d1 SoC
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>
Cc:     devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
        schung@nuvoton.com, Jacky Huang <ychuang3@nuvoton.com>
References: <20230315072902.9298-1-ychuang570808@gmail.com>
 <f2699aa1-4d8a-48c0-b332-484db0b04252@app.fastmail.com>
 <1a1277ac-4ae5-eaab-01c3-0242c12be76b@gmail.com>
 <6ed7e89f-2d2c-4134-9c6f-a9d18e2fc8a8@app.fastmail.com>
 <a90fc6f6-df95-3a4f-da5b-ebdafbe7dd34@linaro.org>
From:   Jacky Huang <ychuang570808@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <a90fc6f6-df95-3a4f-da5b-ebdafbe7dd34@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk


On 2023/3/18 上午 12:06, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 17/03/2023 14:21, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> I only now saw that you had already submitted this several times
>> at the beginning of last year, and this is technically 'v5'
>> of the series, and it would make sense to add 'v6' to the subject
>> next time and link back to the previous [1] and this[2] submission
>> on lore.kernel.org.
> ... and address previous feedback. Or at least make it clear in
> changelog that you addressed it, so our review was not ignored.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof


Dear Krzysztof,


Thank you.

Of course, I will add back the changelog.

And, I have a question. If subsequent modifications made to a patch, 
should the

"Reviewed-by" still be valid? Can we keep it?

Best regards,

Jacky Huang