Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932136AbXIRRzy (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Sep 2007 13:55:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759911AbXIRRzm (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Sep 2007 13:55:42 -0400 Received: from smtp106.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.85.216]:36591 "HELO smtp106.mail.mud.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1761275AbXIRRzl (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Sep 2007 13:55:41 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.au; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=Nj4AGr+i5C10aQvmI/6hcMz9+HdtVWflMShBVos0VZsk8IC9o5is/RzpXF2f41w520oUuxDGARXDWOD9uwU5MnVdcUamML6dXEOP90OrK+yBPNYnem6iEnPSBDgzh/ljEl0BB2UNttM2HEi3y5+jAVMYEYeMF07O4Y9EWz/Qm2E= ; X-YMail-OSG: BCHsBYIVM1nQMombKbInqGmBVfq6lRCNtBJ1mdqiEg1UYvDnx_wc3AJRBHnTjHmQJitweSlJtg-- From: Nick Piggin To: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: use pagevec to rotate reclaimable page Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:47:44 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: Hisashi Hifumi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org References: <6.0.0.20.2.20070907113025.024dfbb8@172.19.0.2> <200709181129.50253.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> <20070918104435.2ba25ff3.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20070918104435.2ba25ff3.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200709181147.45006.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1179 Lines: 30 On Wednesday 19 September 2007 03:44, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:29:50 +1000 Nick Piggin wrote: > > It would be interesting to test -mm kernels. They have a patch which > > reduces zone lock contention quite a lot. > > They do? Which patch? Hmm... mm-buffered-write-cleanup.patch. > > I think your patch is a nice idea, and with less zone lock contention in > > other areas, it is possible that it might produce a relatively larger > > improvement. > > I'm a bit wobbly about this patch - it adds additional single-cpu overhead > to reduce multiple-cpu overhead and latency. Yeah, that's true. Although maybe it gets significantly more after the patch in -mm. Possibly other page batching sites have similar issues on UP... I wonder if a type of pagevec that turns into a noop on UP would be interesting... probably totally unmeasurable and not worth the cost of code maintenance ;) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/