Date:   Mon, 20 Mar 2023 14:44:43 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To:     William Breathitt Gray <william.gray@linaro.org>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] regmap-irq: Drop map from handle_mask_sync()
 parameters
Message-ID: <ZBhVOziLz6WL6vv7@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <cover.1679259085.git.william.gray@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <cover.1679259085.git.william.gray@linaro.org>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 05:02:00PM -0400, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> Changes in v2:
>  - Pull out 104-dio-48e refactor to a precursor patch
> 
> Remove the map parameter from the struct regmap_irq_chip callback
> handle_mask_sync() because it can be passed via the irq_drv_data
> parameter instead. The gpio-104-dio-48e driver is the only consumer of
> this callback and is thus updated accordingly.
> 
> A couple pending patchsets also utilize handle_mask_sync() [0][1], so
> it'll be useful to merge the changes in this series first to avoid
> subsequent noise adjusting the dependent drivers.
> 
> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/r/cover.1677515341.git.william.gray@linaro.org/
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/cover.1678106722.git.william.gray@linaro.org/

Good idea and intention, but something went wrong with bisectability as pointed
out by the build bot. As a last resort you would need to squash these two, but
try first another possible patch series split.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko