Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFABDC6FD1D for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 17:06:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233346AbjCTRGh (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Mar 2023 13:06:37 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44388 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233178AbjCTRGK (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Mar 2023 13:06:10 -0400 Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk (pandora.armlinux.org.uk [IPv6:2001:4d48:ad52:32c8:5054:ff:fe00:142]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC86B37720; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 10:01:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armlinux.org.uk; s=pandora-2019; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=8uUun6889VGz1VyHWim1MwLUmL0N9hTsI+n3fZ+GgII=; b=ise61BJHw0xZre3ghzJpj7t8yw DYDTB4+Nw21quwjKC1xV4zKEGZZKXFA5zVoisiH1AB+rK7/dpzABKMyCGP5fLIx/aLnient8AMrpU dWCAfTXDuya+4KCPYuIR6HUGVaH2rB563bIiN+h6RGcZtxM+6L/Kr9saAxRAamMjg1cYwgBRQ6PCy RAucL9HmD4T4oGuSVFimF3GrbukZSIIOGZjNUkAYXhROiJ37vwKLOFKrPBNdplPHVT0mUAa8MVhnq uk/yTzzXELf8aHvJ83Vr/93eSkk8OF7xC0qVWEK8pS9ZDqY65+l0/pG29z3WUtXw+/xY08DNavD7O YtJqWVeA==; Received: from shell.armlinux.org.uk ([fd8f:7570:feb6:1:5054:ff:fe00:4ec]:33664) by pandora.armlinux.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1peIrf-0007vU-1l; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 17:00:07 +0000 Received: from linux by shell.armlinux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1peIrc-0006hW-7e; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 17:00:04 +0000 Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 17:00:04 +0000 From: "Russell King (Oracle)" To: Lee Jones Cc: Vinod Koul , Colin Foster , linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Paolo Abeni , Jakub Kicinski , Eric Dumazet , "David S. Miller" , Florian Fainelli , Andrew Lunn , UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Alexandre Belloni , Claudiu Manoil , Vladimir Oltean Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/9] phy: phy-ocelot-serdes: add ability to be used in a non-syscon configuration Message-ID: References: <20230317185415.2000564-1-colin.foster@in-advantage.com> <20230317185415.2000564-2-colin.foster@in-advantage.com> <20230320133431.GB2673958@google.com> <20230320164136.GC2673958@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230320164136.GC2673958@google.com> Sender: Russell King (Oracle) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 04:41:36PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > On Mon, 20 Mar 2023, Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 01:34:31PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > > Once again netdev seems to have applied patches from other subsystems > > > without review/ack. What makes netdev different to any other kernel > > > subsystem? What would happen if other random maintainers started > > > applying netdev patches without appropriate review? I suspect someone > > > would become understandably grumpy. > > > > Why again are you addressing your whinge to me? I'm not one of the > > netdev maintainers, but I've pointed out what happens in netdev > > land. However, you seem to *not* want to discuss it directly with > > DaveM/Jakub/Paolo - as illustrated again with yet another response > > to *me* rather than addressing your concerns *to* the people who > > you have an issue with. > > > > This is not communication. Effectively, this is sniping, because > > rather than discussing it with the individuals concerned, you are > > instead preferring to discuss it with others. > > > > Please stop this. > > Read the above paragraph again. You sent your email _TO_ me, that means you addressed your comments primarily _to_ me. RFC2822: The "To:" field contains the address(es) of the primary recipient(s) of the message. The "Cc:" field (where the "Cc" means "Carbon Copy" in the sense of making a copy on a typewriter using carbon paper) contains the addresses of others who are to receive the message, though the content of the message may not be directed at them. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!