Message-ID: <1679364946.2946873-1-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio: add VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA feature support
Date:   Tue, 21 Mar 2023 10:15:46 +0800
From:   Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
To:     Viktor Prutyanov <viktor@daynix.com>
Cc:     virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yan@daynix.com, viktor@daynix.com,
        mst@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com
References: <20230320115451.1232171-1-viktor@daynix.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230320115451.1232171-1-viktor@daynix.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 14:54:51 +0300, Viktor Prutyanov <viktor@daynix.com> wrote:
> According to VirtIO spec v1.2, VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA feature
> indicates that the driver passes extra data along with the queue
> notifications.
>
> In a split queue case, the extra data is 16-bit available index. In a
> packed queue case, the extra data is 1-bit wrap counter and 15-bit
> available index.
>
> Add support for this feature for both MMIO and PCI.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viktor Prutyanov <viktor@daynix.com>
> ---
>  drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c       | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>  drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.h |  4 ++++
>  drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_legacy.c |  2 +-
>  drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c |  2 +-
>  drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c       | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/virtio_ring.h        |  2 ++
>  include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h |  6 ++++++
>  8 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c
> index 3ff746e3f24a..05da5ad7fc93 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c
> @@ -285,6 +285,19 @@ static bool vm_notify(struct virtqueue *vq)
>  	return true;
>  }
>
> +static bool vm_notify_with_data(struct virtqueue *vq)
> +{
> +	struct virtio_mmio_device *vm_dev = to_virtio_mmio_device(vq->vdev);
> +	__le32 data = vring_fill_notification_data(vq);
> +
> +	writel(data, vm_dev->base + VIRTIO_MMIO_QUEUE_NOTIFY);
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +#define VM_NOTIFY(vdev) (__virtio_test_bit((vdev), VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA) \
> +	? vm_notify_with_data : vm_notify)


Is this macro necessary, it is only used once. And I don't recognize that this
logic is necessary to use macro.

> +
>  /* Notify all virtqueues on an interrupt. */
>  static irqreturn_t vm_interrupt(int irq, void *opaque)
>  {
> @@ -397,7 +410,7 @@ static struct virtqueue *vm_setup_vq(struct virtio_device *vdev, unsigned int in
>
>  	/* Create the vring */
>  	vq = vring_create_virtqueue(index, num, VIRTIO_MMIO_VRING_ALIGN, vdev,
> -				 true, true, ctx, vm_notify, callback, name);
> +			true, true, ctx, VM_NOTIFY(vdev), callback, name);
>  	if (!vq) {
>  		err = -ENOMEM;
>  		goto error_new_virtqueue;
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c
> index a6c86f916dbd..bf7daad9ce65 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c
> @@ -43,6 +43,16 @@ bool vp_notify(struct virtqueue *vq)
>  	/* we write the queue's selector into the notification register to
>  	 * signal the other end */
>  	iowrite16(vq->index, (void __iomem *)vq->priv);
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +bool vp_notify_with_data(struct virtqueue *vq)
> +{
> +	__le32 data = vring_fill_notification_data(vq);
> +
> +	iowrite32(data, (void __iomem *)vq->priv);
> +
>  	return true;
>  }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.h b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.h
> index 23112d84218f..9a7212dcbb32 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.h
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.h
> @@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ static struct virtio_pci_device *to_vp_device(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>  void vp_synchronize_vectors(struct virtio_device *vdev);
>  /* the notify function used when creating a virt queue */
>  bool vp_notify(struct virtqueue *vq);
> +bool vp_notify_with_data(struct virtqueue *vq);
>  /* the config->del_vqs() implementation */
>  void vp_del_vqs(struct virtio_device *vdev);
>  /* the config->find_vqs() implementation */
> @@ -114,6 +115,9 @@ int vp_find_vqs(struct virtio_device *vdev, unsigned int nvqs,
>  		struct irq_affinity *desc);
>  const char *vp_bus_name(struct virtio_device *vdev);
>
> +#define VP_NOTIFY(vdev) (__virtio_test_bit((vdev), VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA) \
> +	? vp_notify : vp_notify_with_data)
> +

I also think that this is not necessary, although it has been used twice.


>  /* Setup the affinity for a virtqueue:
>   * - force the affinity for per vq vector
>   * - OR over all affinities for shared MSI
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_legacy.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_legacy.c
> index 2257f1b3d8ae..b98e994cae48 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_legacy.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_legacy.c
> @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ static struct virtqueue *setup_vq(struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev,
>  	vq = vring_create_virtqueue(index, num,
>  				    VIRTIO_PCI_VRING_ALIGN, &vp_dev->vdev,
>  				    true, false, ctx,
> -				    vp_notify, callback, name);
> +				    VP_NOTIFY(&vp_dev->vdev), callback, name);
>  	if (!vq)
>  		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c
> index 9e496e288cfa..7fcd8af5af7e 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c
> @@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ static struct virtqueue *setup_vq(struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev,
>  	vq = vring_create_virtqueue(index, num,
>  				    SMP_CACHE_BYTES, &vp_dev->vdev,
>  				    true, true, ctx,
> -				    vp_notify, callback, name);
> +				    VP_NOTIFY(&vp_dev->vdev), callback, name);
>  	if (!vq)
>  		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> index 41144b5246a8..8de0800efee7 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> @@ -2752,6 +2752,21 @@ void vring_del_virtqueue(struct virtqueue *_vq)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vring_del_virtqueue);
>
> +__le32 vring_fill_notification_data(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> +{
> +	struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
> +	u16 next;
> +
> +	if (vq->packed_ring)
> +		next = (vq->packed.next_avail_idx & ~(1 << 15)) |
> +			((u16)vq->packed.avail_wrap_counter << 15);
> +	else
> +		next = virtio16_to_cpu(_vq->vdev, vq->split.vring.avail->idx);
> +
> +	return cpu_to_le32(((u32)next << 16) | _vq->index);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vring_fill_notification_data);
> +
>  /* Manipulates transport-specific feature bits. */
>  void vring_transport_features(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>  {
> @@ -2771,6 +2786,8 @@ void vring_transport_features(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>  			break;
>  		case VIRTIO_F_ORDER_PLATFORM:
>  			break;
> +		case VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA:
> +			break;
>  		default:
>  			/* We don't understand this bit. */
>  			__virtio_clear_bit(vdev, i);
> diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_ring.h b/include/linux/virtio_ring.h
> index 8b95b69ef694..3222324fb244 100644
> --- a/include/linux/virtio_ring.h
> +++ b/include/linux/virtio_ring.h
> @@ -117,4 +117,6 @@ void vring_del_virtqueue(struct virtqueue *vq);
>  void vring_transport_features(struct virtio_device *vdev);
>
>  irqreturn_t vring_interrupt(int irq, void *_vq);
> +
> +__le32 vring_fill_notification_data(struct virtqueue *_vq);
>  #endif /* _LINUX_VIRTIO_RING_H */
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h
> index 3c05162bc988..2c712c654165 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h
> @@ -99,6 +99,12 @@
>   */
>  #define VIRTIO_F_SR_IOV			37
>
> +/*
> + * This feature indicates that the driver passes extra data (besides
> + * identifying the virtqueue) in its device notifications.
> + */
> +#define VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA	38
> +


Although this patch is not large, I think it can be split:

* add VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA
* pci support
* mmio support


This is beneficial to backport.

Thanks.

>  /*
>   * This feature indicates that the driver can reset a queue individually.
>   */
> --
> 2.35.1
>
>