Date:   Tue, 21 Mar 2023 08:46:06 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Wang Yugui <wangyugui@e16-tech.com>
Cc:     stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org,
        patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de,
        jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/198] 6.1.21-rc1 review
Message-ID: <ZBlgvqscqTJLiCE4@kroah.com>
References: <20230320145507.420176832@linuxfoundation.org>
 <20230321074819.2A17.409509F4@e16-tech.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230321074819.2A17.409509F4@e16-tech.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 07:48:20AM +0800, Wang Yugui wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.21 release.
> > There are 198 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 22 Mar 2023 14:54:29 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.21-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> fstests btrfs/056 triggered a panic for 6.1.21-rc1, but the panic does not
> happen on 6.1.20.
> 
> the patch *1 dropped in 6.1.9-rc is added to 6.1.21-rc1 again.
> *1 Subject: blk-mq: move the srcu_struct used for quiescing to the tagset
> 
> we need to drop it again, or need more patches.

Wow, I think this holds the record for the "patch that keeps getting
applied" :(

Sasha, can you add this one to your "never apply it" list for 6.1.y?

thanks,

greg k-h