MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CANn89iLy+-rQDSKCg6g=xkNLL5SmgkB7gyMSgxCEPp13-+eLbw@mail.gmail.com>
 <26269528616bb41dcb2b5a3314f87fb36d45acac.camel@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <26269528616bb41dcb2b5a3314f87fb36d45acac.camel@redhat.com>
From:   Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 Mar 2023 08:43:20 -0700
Message-ID: <CANn89i+vKjBZAC-Htt9K6+WxFHaSH190Mm9WMiy2ZUkuQJZ0Gg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: syzbot + epoll
To:     Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Xiumei Mu <xmu@redhat.com>,
        Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>,
        Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 8:20=E2=80=AFAM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> wro=
te:

> (adding Hillf, as was looking to this issue, too)
>
> The fix LGTM and syzkaller says it addresses the issue:
>
> https://groups.google.com/g/syzkaller-bugs/c/oiBUmGsqz_Q/m/1IQ4vbROAgAJ
>
> I see Andrew removed the patch from the -mm tree. I guess at this point
> a new version of "epoll: use refcount to reduce ep_mutex contention",
> including the above is needed?
>
> If the above is correct, would a co-devel tag fit you Eric?

Squashing patches make sense for sure, thanks.