Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 22 Mar 2023 02:07:40 +0100
From:   Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@meta.com, mingo@kernel.org, stern@rowland.harvard.edu,
        will@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, boqun.feng@gmail.com,
        npiggin@gmail.com, dhowells@redhat.com, j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk,
        luc.maranget@inria.fr, akiyks@gmail.com,
        Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@huaweicloud.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH memory-model 5/8] tools/memory-model: Provide exact SRCU
 semantics
Message-ID: <ZBpU3BAqmTQHxEyN@andrea>
References: <778147e4-ccab-40cf-b6ef-31abe4e3f6b7@paulmck-laptop>
 <20230321010246.50960-5-paulmck@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230321010246.50960-5-paulmck@kernel.org>
Precedence: bulk

> +let carry-srcu-data = (data ; [~ Srcu-unlock] ; rf)*

> +let carry-dep = (data ; [~ Srcu-unlock] ; rfi)*

Nit: we use "~M" (no space after the unary operator) in this file, is
there a reason for the different styles?

  Andrea