Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <ea863eac-58bd-cd61-ce5c-a0393bb4e4a8@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 22 Mar 2023 09:35:35 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.9.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] arm64: dts: qcom: Enable Crypto Engine for a few
 Qualcomm SoCs
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, agross@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        andersson@kernel.org, bhupesh.linux@gmail.com, robh+dt@kernel.org,
        vladimir.zapolskiy@linaro.org, rfoss@kernel.org
References: <20230321190118.3327360-1-bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org>
 <41111f93-ef02-0e57-98af-01327213d854@linaro.org>
 <CAH=2NtziWx2g_4K92iH+9DLo8XV0P32NNnEpxy6f0G_dQOVs+Q@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAH=2NtziWx2g_4K92iH+9DLo8XV0P32NNnEpxy6f0G_dQOVs+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 22/03/2023 09:33, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Mar 2023 at 00:57, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 21.03.2023 20:01, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
>>> This patchset enables Crypto Engine support for Qualcomm SoCs like
>>> SM6115, SM8150, SM8250 and SM8350.
>>>
>>> While at it, also fix the compatible string for BAM DMA engine
>>> used in sdm845.dtsi
>>>
>>> Note that:
>>> - SM8250 crypto engine patch utilizes the work already done by myself and
>>>   Vladimir.
>>> - SM8350 crypto engine patch utilizes the work already done by Robert.
>>>
>>> This patchset depends on the dt-bindings patch which added support for
>>> SM6115 and QCS2290 SoCs:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230321184811.3325725-1-bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org/
>> You could have included that one here for easier tracking!
> 
> Err.. the dt-binding maintainers have been asking to split the
> dt-binding patches from
> the dts ones in the past. So, let's stick to that for now :)

For submissions? No, we did not.

Best regards,
Krzysztof