Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230312112612.31869-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
 <CAG_fn=UHz93odccvRFo5H2yKq9URTcQs2jWWc5Yehioq-QC8hA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAG_fn=XE-iDrPEB=bsnAqxYkRi+nFvTSbywOz56W_xQWLHeCAQ@mail.gmail.com> <06c24686-fcc5-22bf-8a35-e7e18244e94b@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <06c24686-fcc5-22bf-8a35-e7e18244e94b@intel.com>
From:   Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Date:   Wed, 22 Mar 2023 13:48:59 +0100
Message-ID: <CAG_fn=XBibcjsGZX=+m7pQTduNiaBZLTGEM4m99hwyiT0Q3-mA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv16 00/17] Linear Address Masking enabling
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc:     "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Kostya Serebryany <kcc@google.com>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
        Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
        Taras Madan <tarasmadan@google.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
        "H . J . Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
        Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
        Bharata B Rao <bharata@amd.com>,
        Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
        Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 6:28=E2=80=AFPM Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>=
 wrote:
>
> On 3/17/23 10:21, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 6:18=E2=80=AFPM Alexander Potapenko <glider@goo=
gle.com> wrote:
> >> Dear x86 maintainers,
> >>
> >> the series looks pretty mature now, any chance it can be considered
> >> for upstream?
> >>
> > (Adding the maintainers just to be sure)
>
> Yes, I'm running it through a few tests right now actually.  If
> everything looks good, I'm planning on queueing it.

Hi Dave,

Did this work out?

Thanks!