Received: by 2002:a05:6358:11c7:b0:104:8066:f915 with SMTP id i7csp6497888rwl; Wed, 22 Mar 2023 11:22:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set9yP4tiHr+u9fCS5pVy0ob1cnOiH73sHCwk50Mf37svgTDQLLeiFCYFP/EUiL+inOpzdEQa X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7b96:b0:925:5549:f81c with SMTP id s22-20020a1709067b9600b009255549f81cmr9188620ejo.6.1679509353891; Wed, 22 Mar 2023 11:22:33 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1679509353; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=UlJKVcbWIzxAYRSF8dhG7mWVzjCyTKXO6lceeEZzRQdhGwWY+2QpfTXDdl1t5WEjuQ oUV9gbbx/QvZtBBBpKB37wIlBAwfFNcDdFPKyRk3AtaZMErMheBglgREXEEf3GiLxQee p/8ATSXGPmT61g4zRXNCyJ3BVYhYSbfFzB/+EYM4f4kNvxWVej/0GSnitRgwzJIPEVHW BYAZ/4DgTrYdCxp5a+X+BXGO9nzWnAS8ZRYYH4NHqQ7eQqPxDDPf4uhyPrGsRDxVZw4Z pE3XpbPAHDO3013FYYKSgTnFUjaGSRcBHF+HcxGww3k0FniSudxJXgelFxkAJkqPiaZg iLDQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:to:subject:message-id :date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version; bh=L23a8NYefIvNHvd/L05M49V3LUnaod4pYCPARyQ1nIo=; b=DyAdY5kVjQd95JhGldojJ8b6ewehWFrXC/LmwMRyR+B1xD5o9QqEgRlmnI+peEG4dO bIdSAPKH/5AYqlXqz1ym7jngVH/H1fRvSxl26c2w7BbNfOxs0rcs2OR9oOltht9i/NNU JzAfAEZewHs0nF9+XcIRfxt8IiEXy5z8qmwNvidFz1NaAOPhpkCJA9W5mBqhB6efZ9Yt hkMVF7EBNdxtU0p09kIowtUMQx1z8Ow0ma7043VHj+sqNY2dUAAAiB47iWl+BObuL91D An9h4rJM3/B2jZxWbuEwBrZg6z5CnuDif97LFtNI2VnBbFUL0wJdU4tOOy+Z9ZYz+Jgo f6Pw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id lb1-20020a170907784100b008b27569085esi14849051ejc.732.2023.03.22.11.22.05; Wed, 22 Mar 2023 11:22:33 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229704AbjCVSTF convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 22 Mar 2023 14:19:05 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42738 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229541AbjCVSTE (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Mar 2023 14:19:04 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-f43.google.com (mail-io1-f43.google.com [209.85.166.43]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91C99B476; Wed, 22 Mar 2023 11:19:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-f43.google.com with SMTP id o14so8889776ioa.3; Wed, 22 Mar 2023 11:19:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1679509140; h=content-transfer-encoding:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=2xtlNayJq877PgHIz4rjDi+sIkC5iTw16ABJw2oyXYs=; b=mxRaRCgUfZ3bIuVnCzi+1LcTukgx2oQ2q5885YQmyHebxHKlFwRep+uf7HTkMTbQjz uuIdj237MI2BmI8P5npEo2Jyi8G0uA6isE5K09aa/cvbiQVgAOjh1+H3LMdFrAtibPOG H+X/HFK5s2VVnj3H8IDomYIs329M+P+XWRqZ3WFzeUVm0oKyUk2kJz9zf4ZR07dNtDDT mYrsQmwuwHGTt2Rlfxu1Y7cCb51oT5eTuOtCEO9kjSNoOFD3J6iRj90t59crnyQyNgVp N0YJ2TycSW0xDm1Iue1zL8KYxr+/9s/c7iAh0cK6lwgepkX8xbd1C3M1A+oHunrPkvRZ Z6qg== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKUErzFUZAMZwHtupvnmZfsGQu+HM/XYZAuOzPsDoOESv5LH5tlw BsYBGu8RGljoCOsMI0tn4IecjpXBrACTweyDzqQ= X-Received: by 2002:a5e:d801:0:b0:758:7798:2456 with SMTP id l1-20020a5ed801000000b0075877982456mr4149365iok.6.1679509140360; Wed, 22 Mar 2023 11:19:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230316133557.868731-1-asavkov@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: From: Namhyung Kim Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 11:18:49 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] perf report: append inlines to non-dwarf callchains To: Namhyung Kim , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Ian Rogers , Adrian Hunter , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Milian Wolff , Masami Hiramatsu , Andrii Nakryiko Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN, FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 12:41 AM Artem Savkov wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 02:26:18PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 6:36 AM Artem Savkov wrote: > > > > > > In an email to Arnaldo Andrii Nakryiko suggested that perf can get > > > information about inlined functions from dwarf when available and then > > > add it to userspace stacktraces even in framepointer or lbr mode. > > > Looking closer at perf it turned out all required bits and pieces are > > > already there and inline information can be easily added to both > > > framepointer and lbr callchains by adding an append_inlines() call to > > > add_callchain_ip(). > > > > Looks great! Have you checked it with perf report -g callee ? > > I'm not sure the ordering of inlined functions is maintained > > properly. Maybe you can use --no-children too to simplify > > the output. > > Thanks for the suggestion. I actually have another test program with > functions being numbered rather than (creatively) named, so it might be > easier to use it to figure out ordering. Here's the code: Yep, looks good. Acked-by: Namhyung Kim Thanks, Namhyung > > ====== > #include > #include > > static __attribute__((noinline)) uint32_t func5(uint32_t i) > { > return i + 10; > } > > static uint32_t func4(uint32_t i) > { > return func5(i + 5); > } > > static inline uint32_t func3(uint32_t i) > { > return func4(i + 4); > } > > static __attribute__((noinline)) uint32_t func2(uint32_t i) > { > return func3(i + 3); > } > > static uint32_t func1(uint32_t i) > { > return func2(i + 2); > } > > __attribute__((noinline)) uint64_t entry(void) > { > uint64_t ret = 0; > uint32_t i = 0; > for (i = 0; i < 1000000; i++) { > ret += func1(i); > ret -= func2(i); > ret += func3(i); > ret += func4(i); > ret -= func5(i); > } > return ret; > } > > int main(int argc, char **argv) > { > printf("%s\n", __func__); > return entry(); > } > ====== > > Here is the output I get with '--call-graph callee --no-children' > ====== > # To display the perf.data header info, please use --header/--header-only options. > # > # > # Total Lost Samples: 0 > # > # Samples: 250 of event 'cycles:u' > # Event count (approx.): 26819859 > # > # Overhead Command Shared Object Symbol > # ........ ....... .................... ..................................... > # > 43.58% a.out a.out [.] func5 > | > |--28.93%--entry > | main > | __libc_start_call_main > | > --14.65%--func4 (inlined) > | > |--10.45%--entry > | main > | __libc_start_call_main > | > --4.20%--func3 (inlined) > entry > main > __libc_start_call_main > > 38.80% a.out a.out [.] entry > | > |--23.27%--func4 (inlined) > | | > | |--20.28%--func3 (inlined) > | | func2 > | | main > | | __libc_start_call_main > | | > | --2.99%--entry > | main > | __libc_start_call_main > | > |--8.17%--func5 > | main > | __libc_start_call_main > | > |--3.89%--func1 (inlined) > | entry > | main > | __libc_start_call_main > | > --3.48%--entry > main > __libc_start_call_main > > 13.07% a.out a.out [.] func2 > | > ---func5 > main > __libc_start_call_main > > 1.54% a.out [unknown] [k] 0xffffffff81e011b7 > 1.16% a.out [unknown] [k] 0xffffffff81e00193 > | > --0.57%--__mmap64 (inlined) > __mmap64 (inlined) > > 0.34% a.out ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 [.] __tunable_get_val > 0.34% a.out ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 [.] strcmp > 0.32% a.out libc.so.6 [.] strchr > 0.31% a.out ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 [.] _dl_relocate_object > 0.22% a.out ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 [.] _dl_init_paths > 0.18% a.out ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 [.] get_common_cache_info.constprop.0 > 0.14% a.out ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 [.] __GI___tunables_init > > > # > # (Tip: Show individual samples with: perf script) > # > ====== > > It does not seem to be out of order, or at least it is consistent with > what I get with dwarf unwinders. > > > > > Thanks, > > Namhyung > > > > > > > > I used the following small program for testing: > > > > > > ====== > > > #include > > > #include > > > > > > static __attribute__((noinline)) uint32_t func_noinline2(uint32_t i) > > > { > > > return i + 10; > > > } > > > > > > static inline uint32_t func_declared_inlined(uint32_t i) > > > { > > > return func_noinline2(i + 4); > > > } > > > > > > static __attribute__((noinline)) uint32_t func_noinline(uint32_t i) > > > { > > > return func_declared_inlined(i + 3); > > > } > > > > > > static uint32_t func_inlined(uint32_t i) > > > { > > > return func_noinline(i + 2); > > > } > > > > > > int main(int argc, char **argv) > > > { > > > uint64_t ret = 0; > > > uint32_t i = 0; > > > > > > for (i = 0; i < 10000000; i++) { > > > ret += func_inlined(i); > > > ret -= func_noinline(i); > > > ret -= func_noinline2(i); > > > ret += func_declared_inlined(i); > > > } > > > > > > printf("%s: %ld\n", __func__, ret); > > > return ret; > > > } > > > ====== > > > > > > When built with "gcc -Wall -fno-omit-frame-pointer -O2 -g" (gcc > > > version 12.2.1 20221121 (Red Hat 12.2.1-4) (GCC)) it results in > > > func_inlined() and func_declared_inlined() being inlined into main() > > > and func_declared_inlined() also being inlined into func_noinline(). > > > > > > Here are the diffs for 'perf report --call-graph --stdio' output before > > > and after the patch: > > > > > > Frame-pointer mode recorded with 'perf record --call-graph=fp --freq=max -- ./a.out' > > > ====== > > > --- unpatched.fp 2023-03-16 13:27:22.724017900 +0100 > > > +++ patched.fp 2023-03-16 13:27:28.608857921 +0100 > > > @@ -14,18 +14,24 @@ > > > ---__libc_start_call_main > > > | > > > |--46.31%--main > > > + | | > > > + | --11.16%--func_declared_inlined (inlined) > > > | > > > |--27.41%--func_noinline > > > + | func_declared_inlined (inlined) > > > | > > > --25.68%--func_noinline2 > > > > > > 85.71% 39.64% a.out a.out [.] main > > > | > > > |--46.07%--main > > > + | | > > > + | --11.16%--func_declared_inlined (inlined) > > > | > > > --39.64%--__libc_start_call_main > > > | > > > |--27.17%--func_noinline > > > + | func_declared_inlined (inlined) > > > | > > > --12.23%--func_noinline2 > > > > > > @@ -34,31 +40,47 @@ > > > |--46.31%--__libc_start_call_main > > > | | > > > | --46.07%--main > > > + | | > > > + | --11.16%--func_declared_inlined (inlined) > > > | > > > --25.44%--func_noinline2 > > > > > > 40.56% 13.39% a.out a.out [.] func_noinline > > > | > > > |--27.17%--func_noinline > > > + | func_declared_inlined (inlined) > > > | > > > --13.39%--__libc_start_call_main > > > | > > > --13.15%--func_noinline2 > > > > > > + 27.41% 0.00% a.out a.out [.] func_declared_inlined (inlined) > > > + | > > > + ---func_declared_inlined (inlined) > > > + > > > + 11.16% 0.00% a.out a.out [.] func_declared_inlined (inlined) > > > + | > > > + ---func_declared_inlined (inlined) > > > + > > > 0.30% 0.30% a.out [unknown] [k] 0xffffffff81e011b7 > > > 0.27% 0.00% a.out ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 [.] _dl_start_user > > > 0.25% 0.00% a.out ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 [.] _dl_sysdep_start > > > 0.20% 0.00% a.out ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 [.] dl_main > > > 0.19% 0.19% a.out [unknown] [k] 0xffffffff81e00193 > > > + 0.18% 0.00% a.out a.out [.] func_inlined (inlined) > > > 0.10% 0.05% a.out ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 [.] _dl_relocate_object > > > 0.09% 0.00% a.out [unknown] [k] 0x00007fef811be880 > > > 0.09% 0.00% a.out ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 [.] _dl_map_object > > > 0.06% 0.00% a.out libc.so.6 [.] sysmalloc > > > 0.05% 0.00% a.out ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 [.] munmap > > > - 0.05% 0.00% a.out ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 [.] mprotect > > > + 0.05% 0.00% a.out ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 [.] rtld_timer_accum (inlined) > > > + 0.05% 0.00% a.out ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 [.] rtld_timer_stop (inlined) > > > + 0.05% 0.00% a.out ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 [.] __mprotect (inlined) > > > 0.05% 0.00% a.out libc.so.6 [.] __x86_cacheinfo_ifunc > > > + 0.05% 0.00% a.out ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 [.] elf_dynamic_do_Rela (inlined) > > > 0.05% 0.00% a.out ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 [.] _dl_map_object_from_fd > > > - 0.04% 0.00% a.out ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 [.] mmap64 > > > + 0.05% 0.00% a.out ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 [.] elf_get_dynamic_info (inlined) > > > + 0.04% 0.00% a.out ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 [.] __mmap64 (inlined) > > > 0.04% 0.04% a.out ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 [.] _dl_cache_libcmp > > > 0.04% 0.00% a.out [unknown] [.] 0x000000000001b19a > > > 0.04% 0.00% a.out [unknown] [k] 0000000000000000 > > > @@ -66,13 +88,15 @@ > > > 0.04% 0.04% a.out ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 [.] do_lookup_x > > > 0.03% 0.03% a.out ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 [.] intel_check_word.constprop.0 > > > 0.03% 0.00% a.out [unknown] [.] 0x0000000004000000 > > > + 0.03% 0.00% a.out ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 [.] intel_check_word (inlined) > > > 0.02% 0.00% a.out ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 [.] _dl_start > > > 0.02% 0.02% a.out ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 [.] __GI___tunables_init > > > 0.02% 0.00% a.out [unknown] [.] 0x722f3d4b434f535f > > > 0.02% 0.00% a.out [unknown] [.] 0x00007ffebdd69f59 > > > + 0.02% 0.00% a.out ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 [.] tunable_is_name (inlined) > > > 0.01% 0.00% a.out ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 [.] _start > > > ====== > > > > > > LBR mode recorded with 'perf record --call-graph=lbr -- ./a.out' > > > ====== > > > --- unpatched.lbr 2023-03-16 13:27:50.853253211 +0100 > > > +++ patched.lbr 2023-03-16 13:27:56.312104813 +0100 > > > @@ -6,58 +6,95 @@ > > > # Samples: 238 of event 'cycles:u' > > > # Event count (approx.): 193485873 > > > # > > > -# Children Self Command Shared Object Symbol > > > -# ........ ........ ....... .................... ................................. > > > +# Children Self Command Shared Object Symbol > > > +# ........ ........ ....... .................... ............................. > > > # > > > 99.11% 36.87% a.out a.out [.] main > > > | > > > |--62.24%--main > > > | | > > > - | --17.47%--func_noinline > > > + | |--11.05%--func_inlined (inlined) > > > + | | func_noinline > > > + | | func_declared_inlined (inlined) > > > + | | > > > + | --6.42%--func_noinline > > > + | func_declared_inlined (inlined) > > > | > > > --36.87%--_start > > > - __libc_start_main@@GLIBC_2.34 > > > + __libc_start_main_alias_2 (inlined) > > > __libc_start_call_main > > > main > > > | > > > - |--24.52%--func_noinline > > > + |--17.51%--func_inlined (inlined) > > > + | func_noinline > > > + | func_declared_inlined (inlined) > > > + | > > > + |--8.45%--func_noinline2 > > > | > > > - --10.01%--func_noinline2 > > > + |--7.01%--func_noinline > > > + | func_declared_inlined (inlined) > > > + | > > > + --1.57%--func_declared_inlined (inlined) > > > + func_noinline2 > > > > > > 99.11% 0.00% a.out a.out [.] _start > > > | > > > ---_start > > > - __libc_start_main@@GLIBC_2.34 > > > + __libc_start_main_alias_2 (inlined) > > > __libc_start_call_main > > > main > > > | > > > - |--41.99%--func_noinline > > > + |--28.55%--func_inlined (inlined) > > > + | func_noinline > > > + | func_declared_inlined (inlined) > > > + | > > > + |--13.43%--func_noinline > > > + | func_declared_inlined (inlined) > > > | > > > - --10.37%--func_noinline2 > > > + |--8.81%--func_noinline2 > > > + | > > > + --1.57%--func_declared_inlined (inlined) > > > + func_noinline2 > > > > > > - 99.11% 0.00% a.out libc.so.6 [.] __libc_start_main@@GLIBC_2.34 > > > + 99.11% 0.00% a.out libc.so.6 [.] __libc_start_main_alias_2 (inlined) > > > | > > > - ---__libc_start_main@@GLIBC_2.34 > > > + ---__libc_start_main_alias_2 (inlined) > > > __libc_start_call_main > > > main > > > | > > > - |--41.99%--func_noinline > > > + |--28.55%--func_inlined (inlined) > > > + | func_noinline > > > + | func_declared_inlined (inlined) > > > + | > > > + |--13.43%--func_noinline > > > + | func_declared_inlined (inlined) > > > + | > > > + |--8.81%--func_noinline2 > > > | > > > - --10.37%--func_noinline2 > > > + --1.57%--func_declared_inlined (inlined) > > > + func_noinline2 > > > > > > 99.11% 0.00% a.out libc.so.6 [.] __libc_start_call_main > > > | > > > ---__libc_start_call_main > > > main > > > | > > > - |--41.99%--func_noinline > > > + |--28.55%--func_inlined (inlined) > > > + | func_noinline > > > + | func_declared_inlined (inlined) > > > | > > > - --10.37%--func_noinline2 > > > + |--13.43%--func_noinline > > > + | func_declared_inlined (inlined) > > > + | > > > + |--8.81%--func_noinline2 > > > + | > > > + --1.57%--func_declared_inlined (inlined) > > > + func_noinline2 > > > > > > 54.44% 44.43% a.out a.out [.] func_noinline2 > > > | > > > |--44.43%--_start > > > - | __libc_start_main@@GLIBC_2.34 > > > + | __libc_start_main_alias_2 (inlined) > > > | __libc_start_call_main > > > | main > > > | > > > @@ -66,19 +103,42 @@ > > > 41.99% 17.47% a.out a.out [.] func_noinline > > > | > > > |--24.52%--func_noinline > > > + | func_declared_inlined (inlined) > > > | > > > --17.47%--_start > > > - __libc_start_main@@GLIBC_2.34 > > > + __libc_start_main_alias_2 (inlined) > > > __libc_start_call_main > > > main > > > - func_noinline > > > + | > > > + |--11.05%--func_inlined (inlined) > > > + | func_noinline > > > + | func_declared_inlined (inlined) > > > + | > > > + --6.42%--func_noinline > > > + func_declared_inlined (inlined) > > > + > > > + 41.99% 0.00% a.out a.out [.] func_declared_inlined (inlined) > > > + | > > > + ---func_declared_inlined (inlined) > > > + > > > + 28.55% 0.00% a.out a.out [.] func_inlined (inlined) > > > + | > > > + ---func_inlined (inlined) > > > + func_noinline > > > + func_declared_inlined (inlined) > > > + > > > + 1.57% 0.00% a.out a.out [.] func_declared_inlined (inlined) > > > + | > > > + ---func_declared_inlined (inlined) > > > + func_noinline2 > > > > > > 0.88% 0.00% a.out ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 [.] _start > > > | > > > ---_start > > > _dl_start > > > | > > > - --0.71%--_dl_sysdep_start > > > + --0.71%--_dl_start_final (inlined) > > > + _dl_sysdep_start > > > dl_main > > > _dl_map_object_deps > > > _dl_catch_exception > > > @@ -92,7 +152,8 @@ > > > | > > > ---_dl_start > > > | > > > - --0.71%--_dl_sysdep_start > > > + --0.71%--_dl_start_final (inlined) > > > + _dl_sysdep_start > > > dl_main > > > _dl_map_object_deps > > > _dl_catch_exception > > > @@ -106,6 +167,20 @@ > > > | > > > ---_start > > > _dl_start > > > + _dl_start_final (inlined) > > > + _dl_sysdep_start > > > + dl_main > > > + _dl_map_object_deps > > > + _dl_catch_exception > > > + openaux > > > + _dl_map_object > > > + _dl_map_object_from_fd > > > + _dl_new_object > > > + strlen > > > + > > > + 0.71% 0.00% a.out ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 [.] _dl_start_final (inlined) > > > + | > > > + ---_dl_start_final (inlined) > > > _dl_sysdep_start > > > dl_main > > > _dl_map_object_deps > > > ====== > > > > > > No meaningful differences in output with callchains in dwarf mode or when > > > tracing a binary that was compiled with no dwarf debuginfo. > > > > > > Artem Savkov (1): > > > perf report: append inlines to non-dwarf callchains > > > > > > tools/perf/util/machine.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------- > > > 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-) > > > > > > -- > > > 2.39.2 > > > > > > > -- > Artem >