Received: by 2002:a05:6358:11c7:b0:104:8066:f915 with SMTP id i7csp6597341rwl; Wed, 22 Mar 2023 12:45:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set9XOLoLzSRRF4ElXPCG7253ooCsf2Yr7WNkZ3K5uKaFaLsRIU5Q3QiJufxP1KslP4r4YF8S X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:388f:b0:23d:e0c1:8b93 with SMTP id mu15-20020a17090b388f00b0023de0c18b93mr4637268pjb.34.1679514331643; Wed, 22 Mar 2023 12:45:31 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1679514331; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=hovjPBB2801jI0D5du8zqwLS4JLdkiCWDrhvPypMkYo4Gmp7Dv9n/GCOt7oB2hgMY5 rb9lAMsLGg0AmSCtMZbGMsx+L+fjpBpee21OVjNeecXd3xqKKeAAPlsaj01da5PhuUW6 18avypGL04ssXLkU/IqLHB4VfhAiPA/JNu+4VJMvIFIyMBFZ9D2OOUZ2RNEJ5rg4hSd4 +jRvoxPPCSi2PxOBj0FCiyNwTySc1IIQ/ifYcCp9y3KmDWS9cmhjLPwVzeKXZa5b3edI dA6tTrpFF3YUWO4LFGKaIWbZl1sMjH7t7aQobfsXCIQqL6xs4VCDB3ABm9i3501YOtw7 eVPA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=FisoeuKEHuuuQm40SA93xQS9edHfTudjgxzWWkyMKu8=; b=mVO+fJMcjpQvgwor06xgb11h2qdHB6zPvyM9NW+JVQ2F2H00cPs/3XglO5f6djOnpN 2w0gQIDxDSK2PGuBVusMlfHmBynwvQVKOyak0jvlBzKiiuUmnHTr8HVnLamR2I1tgLUR h/tq4BUdbvSwSdQ0aCvOwT90CfUYcssfmCT0b7zj5r9UmQCy5iJ/GCqb7q8UcNi3NBdN kRUh+/0fSMqIKnLEAjj5yjJU6jsxybMGr1wa9zlk0bM85eqnJfWneCO0/oM/Fsclm89O pEdCfTsRWD0MGin9unJ/PZdsXrgmyX7h6Ve+jqF3Xy8NVYl+eqbopYz271MRNQRVpmoy uEgw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=plL7QeiG; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f6-20020a655906000000b0050bfc20c795si15558857pgu.279.2023.03.22.12.45.19; Wed, 22 Mar 2023 12:45:31 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=plL7QeiG; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229745AbjCVTor (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 22 Mar 2023 15:44:47 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51078 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230026AbjCVTo0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Mar 2023 15:44:26 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECAFC2E0D8; Wed, 22 Mar 2023 12:44:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86BA7622AF; Wed, 22 Mar 2023 19:44:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C3C18C4339B; Wed, 22 Mar 2023 19:44:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1679514264; bh=v6wrCRpwTbs+zrgf9K0oaoTZYkFPhLyZviupJEf1tXI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=plL7QeiGkYaJ0K144eidjv+DgL5AyOb2UMgZXIgM8GpE8fWlN60RmyPAEnM94Bdvy j7G+yZsXksKF//eOGBis30TdbueyeeEXd0kd872oVYjvc/aHaXKbYAqq7RnwQMZRpI WUuCrQMcshiDkBmY5+nAzvcpVYNTew3AXLlFCmZ6XdSBSs9Y/cSYYLwRrVrhXJcrES cz9Yp2lwfrQclyWeT3sNxzeI60NqJaEXwg9LVFC3n0ecTHTJPRHBaePidHNP/jjD0D 7mKahClgSBj8UWM+2892i7lUoTReyf30CBhYunHRzsYjpJNA4RtsMFnuvEDDuTqteH pen58IO4Ug4Gg== Received: by quaco.ghostprotocols.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B24044052D; Wed, 22 Mar 2023 16:44:20 -0300 (-03) Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 16:44:20 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Namhyung Kim Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Ian Rogers , Adrian Hunter , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Milian Wolff , Masami Hiramatsu , Andrii Nakryiko Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] perf report: append inlines to non-dwarf callchains Message-ID: References: <20230316133557.868731-1-asavkov@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 11:18:49AM -0700, Namhyung Kim escreveu: > On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 12:41 AM Artem Savkov wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 02:26:18PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 6:36 AM Artem Savkov wrote: > > > > > > > > In an email to Arnaldo Andrii Nakryiko suggested that perf can get > > > > information about inlined functions from dwarf when available and then > > > > add it to userspace stacktraces even in framepointer or lbr mode. > > > > Looking closer at perf it turned out all required bits and pieces are > > > > already there and inline information can be easily added to both > > > > framepointer and lbr callchains by adding an append_inlines() call to > > > > add_callchain_ip(). > > > > > > Looks great! Have you checked it with perf report -g callee ? > > > I'm not sure the ordering of inlined functions is maintained > > > properly. Maybe you can use --no-children too to simplify > > > the output. > > > > Thanks for the suggestion. I actually have another test program with > > functions being numbered rather than (creatively) named, so it might be > > easier to use it to figure out ordering. Here's the code: > > Yep, looks good. > > Acked-by: Namhyung Kim So, I'll apply this shorter patch instead, ok? - Arnaldo diff --git a/tools/perf/util/machine.c b/tools/perf/util/machine.c index 803c9d1803dd26ef..abf6167f28217fe6 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/machine.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/machine.c @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ #include static void __machine__remove_thread(struct machine *machine, struct thread *th, bool lock); +static int append_inlines(struct callchain_cursor *cursor, struct map_symbol *ms, u64 ip); static struct dso *machine__kernel_dso(struct machine *machine) { @@ -2322,6 +2323,10 @@ static int add_callchain_ip(struct thread *thread, ms.maps = al.maps; ms.map = al.map; ms.sym = al.sym; + + if (append_inlines(cursor, &ms, ip) == 0) + return 0; + srcline = callchain_srcline(&ms, al.addr); return callchain_cursor_append(cursor, ip, &ms, branch, flags, nr_loop_iter,