Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <554dd2ca-0514-dc1e-9add-d49a711bc1f2@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 23 Mar 2023 07:33:11 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.9.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] mailbox/arm64/ qcom: rework compatibles for
 fallback
To:     Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
        Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org
References: <20230314080917.68246-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
 <c35fd641-12ff-beba-341c-4d0305bcaa40@linaro.org>
 <290b9b19-a320-38a1-4426-51f5725dd54f@linaro.org>
 <59a6ef88-758f-4ec4-f663-47e4caa552c5@linaro.org>
 <CAA8EJprqXVrXdBD6eBHoDGhvST2hViZUbMgdaeKEBohpv5_V3w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAA8EJprqXVrXdBD6eBHoDGhvST2hViZUbMgdaeKEBohpv5_V3w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 22/03/2023 23:28, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Mar 2023 at 19:37, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 16/03/2023 07:52, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 14/03/2023 13:16, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>> On 14/03/2023 10:09, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes since v1
>>>>> ================
>>>>> 1. Rebase
>>>>> 2. Make msm8994 fallback for several variants, not msm8953, because the latter
>>>>>     actually might take some clocks.
>>>>
>>>> Although the approach looks correct, I think that in some cases it tries
>>>> to mark devices compatible judging from the current driver, not from the
>>>> hardware itself.
>>>
>>> Which is what compatibility is about...
> 
> Well, I was trying to say that once we update the driver, the devices
> will not be compatible. But probably our definitions of being
> compatible differ.

What do you want to update in the driver? What's going to happen with
it? What is missing?

Best regards,
Krzysztof