Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <e8fa4f0e-7d06-2b8d-56e2-acfc05b8e886@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 23 Mar 2023 15:43:19 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/12] KVM: VMX: Refactor intel_pmu_set_msr() to align
 with other set_msr() helpers
Content-Language: en-US
From:   Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20230214050757.9623-1-likexu@tencent.com>
 <20230214050757.9623-3-likexu@tencent.com> <Y+6cfen/CpO3/dLO@google.com>
 <3e0f74af-772b-547b-18a9-7ac5c325dd35@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <3e0f74af-772b-547b-18a9-7ac5c325dd35@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi Sean,

the kvm-x86/pmu branch is basically unchanged up to now,
do you need a V5 for this feature ? Thanks.

On 21/2/2023 4:44 pm, Like Xu wrote:
> On 17/2/2023 5:13 am, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> Gah, I forgot to post a patch that gives intel_pmu_get_msr() the same treatment.
>> I'll replace this patch with the combined version below when applying, or will
>> post it separately if a v5 is needed.
> 
> It's fine for me to apply this new patch first and then apply the remaining
> patches with only a tiny rebase effort (tests still remains healthy). More, if
> you have more comments on any other patches that need changing after
> the radio silence, please roar at me on this version.
> 
>>
>> From: Sean Christopherson<seanjc@google.com>
>> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 17:08:03 -0800
>> Subject: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Refactor intel_pmu_{g,}set_msr() to align with
>>   other helpers
>