Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <11b36ca2-4f0a-5fe4-bd84-d93eb0fa34c5@sberdevices.ru>
Date:   Thu, 23 Mar 2023 14:34:44 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.7.1
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 0/2] allocate multiple skbuffs on tx
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
CC:     Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@bytedance.com>,
        <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
        <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <kernel@sberdevices.ru>, <oxffffaa@gmail.com>
References: <f0b283a1-cc63-dc3d-cc0c-0da7f684d4d2@sberdevices.ru>
 <2e06387d-036b-dde2-5ddc-734c65a2f50d@sberdevices.ru>
 <20230323104800.odrkkiuxi3o2l37q@sgarzare-redhat>
 <15e9ac56-bedc-b444-6d9a-8a1355e32eaf@sberdevices.ru>
 <20230323111110.gb4vlaqaf7icymv3@sgarzare-redhat>
From:   Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@sberdevices.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20230323111110.gb4vlaqaf7icymv3@sgarzare-redhat>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk


On 23.03.2023 14:11, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 01:53:40PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 23.03.2023 13:48, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 01:01:40PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>>>> Hello Stefano,
>>>>
>>>> thanks for review!
>>>
>>> You're welcome!
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Since both patches are R-b, i can wait for a few days, then send this
>>>> as 'net-next'?
>>>
>>> Yep, maybe even this series could have been directly without RFC ;-)
>>
>> "directly", You mean 'net' tag? Of just without RFC, like [PATCH v5]. In this case
>> it will be merged to 'net' right?
> 
> Sorry for the confusion. I meant without RFC but with net-next.
> 
> Being enhancements and not fixes this is definitely net-next material,
> so even in RFCs you can already use the net-next tag, so the reviewer
> knows which branch to apply them to. (It's not super important since
> being RFCs it's expected that it's not complete, but it's definitely an
> help for the reviewer).
> 
> Speaking of the RFC, we usually use it for patches that we don't think
> are ready to be merged. But when they reach a good state (like this
> series for example), we can start publishing them already without the
> RFC tag.
> 
> Anyway, if you are not sure, use RFC and then when a maintainer has
> reviewed them all, surely you can remove the RFC tag.
> 
> Hope this helps, at least that's what I usually do, so don't take that
> as a strict rule ;-)

Ah ok, I see now, thanks for details

Thanks, Arseniy

> 
> Thanks,
> Stefano
>