Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 23 Mar 2023 12:50:49 +0100
From:   Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc:     Mike Christie <michael.christie@oracle.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, sgarzare@redhat.com,
        jasowang@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com,
        syzbot+6b27b2d2aba1c80cc13b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] vhost_task: Fix vhost_task_create return value
Message-ID: <20230323115049.vsrnufcaqstpxik3@wittgenstein>
References: <20230322185605.1307-1-michael.christie@oracle.com>
 <20230323033557-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
 <20230323104445.qidusxeruimeawy6@wittgenstein>
 <20230323073918-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230323073918-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 07:43:04AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 11:44:45AM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 03:37:19AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 01:56:05PM -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
> > > > vhost_task_create is supposed to return the vhost_task or NULL on
> > > > failure. This fixes it to return the correct value when the allocation
> > > > of the struct fails.
> > > > 
> > > > Fixes: 77feab3c4156 ("vhost_task: Allow vhost layer to use copy_process") # mainline only
> > > > Reported-by: syzbot+6b27b2d2aba1c80cc13b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> > > > Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <michael.christie@oracle.com>
> > > 
> > > Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > > 
> > > The affected patch is not upstream yet, right?
> > > I don't know if the tree in question allows rebases - linux-next
> > > does. So ideally it would be squashed to avoid issues during bisect.
> > > Still it's error path so I guess not a tragedy even without squashing.
> > 
> > I tend to not rebase once stuff has been in linux-next but I make
> > exceptions as long as it's before -rc4. For now I've put the patch on
> > top (see the other mail I sent) but if it's really important I can
> > squash it after the weekend (I'll be mostly afk until then.).
> 
> Hard to say how important, but I'd prefer that, yes.

Ok, fold the fixup into

e297cd54b3f8 vhost_task: Allow vhost layer to use copy_process

the series is now at:

tree:   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/brauner/linux.git
branch: kernel.user_worker

1a5f8090c6de vhost: move worker thread fields to new struct
e297cd54b3f8 vhost_task: Allow vhost layer to use copy_process
89c8e98d8cfb fork: allow kernel code to call copy_process
094717586bf7 fork: Add kernel_clone_args flag to ignore signals
11f3f500ec8a fork: add kernel_clone_args flag to not dup/clone files
54e6842d0775 fork/vm: Move common PF_IO_WORKER behavior to new flag
c81cc5819faf kernel: Make io_thread and kthread bit fields
73e0c116594d kthread: Pass in the thread's name during creation
cf587db2ee02 kernel: Allow a kernel thread's name to be set in copy_process
e0a98139c162 csky: Remove kernel_thread declaration