Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 23 Mar 2023 16:02:04 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20230202182809.1929122-1-bgardon@google.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
References: <20230202182809.1929122-1-bgardon@google.com>
Message-ID: <167961243530.2554153.5370298632861319341.b4-ty@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/21] KVM: x86/MMU: Formalize the Shadow MMU
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
        David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
        Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>,
        Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 02 Feb 2023 18:27:48 +0000, Ben Gardon wrote:
> This series makes the Shadow MMU a distinct part of the KVM x86 MMU,
> implemented in separate files, with a defined interface to common code.
> 
> When the TDP (Two Dimensional Paging) MMU was added to x86 KVM, it came in
> a separate file with a (reasonably) clear interface. This lead to many
> points in the KVM MMU like this:
> 
> [...]

Applied the first three to kvm-x86 mmu, which just makes me look like a jerk
since they're all my patches.  :-(

[01/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Rename slot rmap walkers to add clarity and clean up code
        https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/727ae3770132
[02/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Replace comment with an actual lockdep assertion on mmu_lock
        https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/eddd9e8302de
[03/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Clean up mmu.c functions that put return type on separate line
        https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/f3d90f901d18

--
https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/tree/next
https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/tree/fixes