Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 24 Mar 2023 05:52:13 +0000
From:   Alok Tiagi <aloktiagi@gmail.com>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc:     viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org,
        David.Laight@aculab.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org,
        hch@infradead.org, Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.pizza>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 1/3] file: Introduce iterate_fd_locked
Message-ID: <ZB06jUBVUdZaYo6J@ip-172-31-38-16.us-west-2.compute.internal>
References: <20230324051526.963702-1-aloktiagi@gmail.com>
 <ZB0zMolmWJ5nEDmh@casper.infradead.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZB0zMolmWJ5nEDmh@casper.infradead.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 05:20:50AM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 05:15:24AM +0000, aloktiagi wrote:
> > Callers holding the files->file_lock lock can call iterate_fd_locked instead of
> > iterate_fd
> 
> You no longer call iterate_fd_locked() in patch 3/3, so this patch can
> be dropped?

yes looks like we won't need this patch and can be dropped. Thank you.