Received: by 2002:a05:6358:11c7:b0:104:8066:f915 with SMTP id i7csp868937rwl; Fri, 24 Mar 2023 03:11:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350ZWARbH8IHTmCrSajB2ekOUCP2eqi6J6tTneobyaEjfdRuJHRFss4BXKTbchptoDz1nHs6n X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:206:b0:4fa:ac78:7f2a with SMTP id t6-20020a056402020600b004faac787f2amr1956836edv.41.1679652681808; Fri, 24 Mar 2023 03:11:21 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1679652681; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=M0dwYaS1/7xvepL0mGjL/iztltAFm6Pwusgh+pnKf2sAFlxEVKMSbgZEzCBIKSVt0V MndkvlOxmTYSF0J9E1QU04U1AWBWI1Ugbknz9rllCyngiPumZXuxEMsychnM4oe+UpEY cSdARqUf1f7VxC9jBfl/mA4VW33A4fPDH3t7w/piI4MSrlZOoM/oqu42XWyyBI+cNwMQ sEtSoXxuTZOaSB5xz9isv8KBHAAXk//BudqhIGqmpP1g08I4P4GegKLDK+jD1Y2ToRjn tHsXEtnu6s/7sftRnrbiIlY/IOnY4D4pF93vFtY1Qf9V1YbP/TvosGJkGlVUAAWTb8Fn Dzhw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=PsRDdGG+QqpslOQfjBlPT9cuwXLgdoUlKfHKu5VjcLQ=; b=xxzGu8yV2krua4uhDiHsCGrl40Sw8q4K+6m96ashzK/N0egXMP4/ZAHZ4XZxvjlVbY DT8vJKnRTg8lNmeVeQEkDl8V/aS0XhKznHX+wSwIdMamY6Jg2YZRODHXBmBt8NJpUWGW 0BrwlIf6JElKPHJjp6YX04fxv/NYn1Eu2eeJ+SMpW9Y/8eMYdBnJMCHOilzREPdIc+Z3 vC0qZfHEHZMZMkqzMD37u7q0jdJhNvsCUrRlDIExhkuiutIcYg8QDD5BwgWhB9IGF6Gm 6oK5LdmerA88llg6xjm9PFu4Gnc5avMU6cbH0+SIl6+92GvP4hx3XoRLED6eoDRHMu5T yhfg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id xo15-20020a170907bb8f00b008b17569ad76si6756767ejc.241.2023.03.24.03.10.57; Fri, 24 Mar 2023 03:11:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231263AbjCXKJv (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 24 Mar 2023 06:09:51 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40760 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229508AbjCXKJt (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Mar 2023 06:09:49 -0400 Received: from loongson.cn (mail.loongson.cn [114.242.206.163]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31606132E2; Fri, 24 Mar 2023 03:09:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from loongson.cn (unknown [10.20.42.153]) by gateway (Coremail) with SMTP id _____8BxONnqdh1krbAQAA--.25214S3; Fri, 24 Mar 2023 18:09:46 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.20.42.153] (unknown [10.20.42.153]) by localhost.localdomain (Coremail) with SMTP id AQAAf8DxAeXndh1kyR0LAA--.40938S3; Fri, 24 Mar 2023 18:09:44 +0800 (CST) Subject: Re: [regression] Bug 217069 - Wake on Lan is broken on r8169 since 6.2 To: Huacai Chen , Linux regressions mailing list Cc: LKML , Huacai Chen , Bob Moore , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , acpica-devel@lists.linuxfoundation.org, ACPI Devel Maling List References: <53e8b4db-e8dd-4dfa-f873-7dcbeac09149@leemhuis.info> <3089214d-292b-885d-9bc1-c81d0101d5f0@leemhuis.info> From: Jianmin Lv Message-ID: Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 18:09:43 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux loongarch64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID: AQAAf8DxAeXndh1kyR0LAA--.40938S3 X-CM-SenderInfo: 5oymxthqpl0qxorr0wxvrqhubq/ X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uk129KBjvJXoWxJFy5uw1xKr4fGF15Zr1fWFg_yoW5XF4kpF WYqFs8Kr4Dtr1UAws2y3W0gr4jvrs5try5ur9xWr48X3s0vFy3Xrn7KrW5uFy3Wr97Ga12 gF1jvwna9ry5JaDanT9S1TB71UUUUUJqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUj1kv1TuYvTs0mT0YCTnIWj qI5I8CrVACY4xI64kE6c02F40Ex7xfYxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT9fnUUIcSsGvfJTRUUU bS8YFVCjjxCrM7AC8VAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1l1xkIjI8I6I8E6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_Wr0E3s 1l1IIY67AEw4v_Jrv_JF1l8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJM28CjxkF64kEwVA0rcxSw2x7M28EF7xv wVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUCVW8JwA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVW8JVWxJwA2z4 x0Y4vEx4A2jsIE14v26F4UJVW0owA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Cr1j6rxdM2kK e7AKxVWUXVWUAwAS0I0E0xvYzxvE52x082IY62kv0487Mc804VCY07AIYIkI8VC2zVCFFI 0UMc02F40EFcxC0VAKzVAqx4xG6I80ewAv7VC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUXVWUAwAv7VC2z280 aVAFwI0_Cr0_Gr1UMcvjeVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwACjcxG0xvEwIxGrwCYjI0SjxkI62 AI1cAE67vIY487MxAIw28IcxkI7VAKI48JMxC20s026xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r4UMxCIbckI 1I0E14v26r1Y6r17MI8I3I0E5I8CrVAFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lx2IqxVCjr7xvwVAFwI0_JrI_Jr Wlx4CE17CEb7AF67AKxVWUtVW8ZwCIc40Y0x0EwIxGrwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j 6r1xMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVWUJVW8JwCI42IY6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_Jr 0_JF4lIxAIcVC2z280aVAFwI0_Cr0_Gr1UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Gr1U YxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x07jbDGOUUUUU= X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Please try the following patch: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/pull/784/commits/0e66e6aae972dac3833bdcbd223aa6a8b1733176 On 2023/3/24 下午5:50, Huacai Chen wrote: > Hi, Thorsten, > > I'm sorry I ignored this email, and Jianmin, could you please > investigate this problem? Thank you. > > Huacai > > On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 5:46 PM Thorsten Leemhuis > wrote: >> >> On 19.03.23 08:20, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: >>> Hi, Thorsten here, the Linux kernel's regression tracker. >>> >>> On 22.02.23 08:57, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >>>> >>>> I noticed a regression report in bugzilla.kernel.org. As many (most?) >>>> kernel developer don't keep an eye on it, I decided to forward it by >>>> mail. Quoting from https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217069 : >>> >>> An issue that looked like a network bug was now bisected and it turns >>> out it's cause by 5c62d5aab875 ("ACPICA: Events: Support fixed PCIe wake >>> event") which Huacai Chen provided. Could you take a look at the ticket >>> linked above? >> >> Huacai Chen, did you look into this? Would be good to have this >> regression fixed rather sooner than later, as it seems to annoy quite a >> few people. >> >> Should we maybe simply revert the problematic change for now and reapply >> it later once the root-issue was found and fixed? >> >> Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) >> -- >> Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking: >> https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr >> If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page. >> >> #regzbot poke >> >>> FWIW, the whole story started like this: >>> >>>>> Ivan Ivanich 2023-02-22 00:51:52 UTC >>>>> >>>>> After upgrade to 6.2 having issues with wake on lan on 2 systems: - >>>>> first is an old lenovo laptop from 2012(Ivy Bridge) with realtek >>>>> network adapter - second is a PC(Haswell refresh) with PCIE realtek >>>>> network adapter >>>>> >>>>> Both uses r8169 driver for network. >>>>> >>>>> On laptop it's not possible to wake on lan after poweroff On PC it's >>>>> not possible to wake on lan up after hibernate but works after >>>>> poweroff >>>>> >>>>> In both cases downgrade to 6.1.x kernel fixes the issue. >>> >>> Meanwhile a few others that ran into the same problem with NICs from >>> different vendors joined the ticket >>> >>> Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) >>> -- >>> Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking: >>> https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr >>> If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.