Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Feedback-ID: i8771445c:Fastmail
Date:   Fri, 24 Mar 2023 14:02:06 +0100
From:   Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>,
        Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>,
        David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
        kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/8] drivers: kunit: Generic helpers for test device
 creation
Message-ID: <20230324130206.di2jatakyjzbtbbz@houat>
References: <cover.1679474247.git.mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
 <bad670ee135391eb902bd34b8bcbe777afabc7fd.1679474247.git.mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
 <ZBrvhfX/NNrJefgt@kroah.com>
 <25f9758f-0010-0181-742a-b18a344110cf@gmail.com>
 <ZBtPhoelZo4U5jwC@kroah.com>
 <20230323101216.w56kz3rudlj23vab@houat>
 <ZBwoRgc2ICBJX/Lq@kroah.com>
 <20230324123632.rtb52jh6zeopjwht@houat>
 <ZB2a291P5abeah6s@kroah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6ak7lv2fpcwgtx3p"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZB2a291P5abeah6s@kroah.com>
Precedence: bulk


--6ak7lv2fpcwgtx3p
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 01:43:07PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 01:36:32PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 11:21:58AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 11:12:16AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 07:57:10PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > > > > > +/**
> > > > > > > > + * test_kunit_helper_alloc_device - Allocate a mock device=
 for a KUnit test
> > > > > > > > + * @test: The test context object
> > > > > > > > + *
> > > > > > > > + * This allocates a fake struct &device to create a mock f=
or a KUnit
> > > > > > > > + * test. The device will also be bound to a fake driver. I=
t will thus be
> > > > > > > > + * able to leverage the usual infrastructure and most nota=
bly the
> > > > > > > > + * device-managed resources just like a "real" device.
> > > > > > >=20
> > > > > > > What specific "usual infrastructure" are you wanting to acces=
s here?
> > > > > > >=20
> > > > > > > And again, if you want a fake device, make a virtual one, by =
just
> > > > > > > calling device_create().
> > > > > > >=20
> > > > > > > Or are you wanting to do "more" with that device pointer than
> > > > > > > device_create() can give you?
> > > > > >=20
> > > > > > Personally, I was (am) only interested in devm_ unwinding. I gu=
ess the
> > > > > > device_create(), device_add(), device_remove()... (didn't study=
 this
> > > > > > sequence in details so sorry if there is errors) could've been =
sufficient
> > > > > > for me. I haven't looked how much of the code that there is for=
 'platform
> > > > > > devices' should be duplicated to support that sequence for test=
ability
> > > > > > purposes.
> > > > >=20
> > > > > Any device can access devm_ code, there's no need for it to be a
> > > > > platform device at all.
> > > >=20
> > > > Sure but the resources are only released if the device is part of a=
 bus,
> > > > so it can't be a root_device (or bare device) either
> > >=20
> > > The resources are not cleaned up when the device is freed no matter if
> > > it's on a bus or not?  If so, then that's a bug that needs to be fixe=
d,
> > > and tested :)
> >=20
> > Please have a look at:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20230324123157.bbwvfq4gsxnlnfwb=
@houat/
> >=20
> > I couldn't get an answer on whether it was considered a bug or not last
> > time, but as you can see there's a clear difference between a root
> > device and a platform device that has probed when it comes to resource
> > cleanup.
>=20
> Great, testing shows there are bugs!  :)

I mean, it wasn't clear to me that it was indeed a bug or the intent
behind devm was that it would only work when probed. Both seemed
reasonable.

> That's a great start of a test, how about submitting that in a way that
> I can test it and we can go from there?

Ack.

I guess I'd need to arrange them somewhat differently for it to be
useful and merge-able.

How would you prefer them to be submitted, in two different files
testing both the root devices and platform devices?

Maxime

--6ak7lv2fpcwgtx3p
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYKAB0WIQRcEzekXsqa64kGDp7j7w1vZxhRxQUCZB2fTgAKCRDj7w1vZxhR
xdpfAP9oZTDAtRR3OFWjK4nljjNoN/eXZOhn5F8nK2vPmIi12AEA8rwLGWNlgYU4
xB/9WOIYtMrwSjbMV2tSTIXRl11ebQ0=
=tbw2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--6ak7lv2fpcwgtx3p--