Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 10:10:42 +0100
From: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
To: Michael Opdenacker <michael@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Tim Bird <tim.bird@am.sony.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
       linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       linux-tiny <Linux-tiny@selenic.com>,
       CE Linux Developers List <celinux-dev@tree.celinuxforum.org>
Subject: Re: [Celinux-dev] [Announce] Linux-tiny project revival
Message-ID: <20070920091042.GA6035@shadowen.org>
References: <46F1645D.9050406@am.sony.com> <20070919142805.e0242fcf.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <46F19778.7000408@am.sony.com> <46F1A4FF.6040808@free-electrons.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <46F1A4FF.6040808@free-electrons.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1104
Lines: 24

On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 12:38:55AM +0200, Michael Opdenacker wrote:

> Andrew, you're completely right... The patches should all aim at being
> included into mainline or die.
> 
> I'm finishing a sequence of crazy weeks and I will have time to send you
> patches one by one next week, starting with the easiest ones.

Well thats good news.  In response to the comments made about testing
the impact of these patches on big-iron I was going to suggest we ask
Andrew to include your patch set in -mm so that it firstly gets at least
compiled on big-iron, and secondly so we could think about how to test
with some of the options enabled on big-iron.

Knowing nothing about these options, from a test perspective it would
be nice if we were able to simply enable "the lot" so we can do "normal"
-mm runs and "tiny" -mm runs without any manual intervention?

-apw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/