Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 24 Mar 2023 17:03:20 +0100
From:   Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To:     Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@foss.st.com>
Cc:     <richard@nod.at>, <vigneshr@ti.com>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>, <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] depends on ARCH_STM32 instead of MACH_STM32MP157
Message-ID: <20230324170320.5087c223@xps-13>
In-Reply-To: <20230324155105.826063-1-christophe.kerello@foss.st.com>
References: <20230324155105.826063-1-christophe.kerello@foss.st.com>
Organization: Bootlin
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

Hi Christophe,

christophe.kerello@foss.st.com wrote on Fri, 24 Mar 2023 16:51:03 +0100:

> To be able to compile the driver on all STM32MP SOCs, we move the
> "depends on" on ARCH_STM32.
>=20
> Christophe Kerello (2):
>   memory: stm32-fmc2-ebi: depends on ARCH_STM32 instead of
>     MACH_STM32MP157
>   mtd: rawnand: stm32_fmc2: depends on ARCH_STM32 instead of
>     MACH_STM32MP157

I don't see issue with taking these two patches in independent trees so
if nobody disagrees I will take the second one through the mtd tree and
let Krzysztof take the first one through mem-ctrl.

>=20
>  drivers/memory/Kconfig       | 2 +-
>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Kconfig | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>=20


Thanks,
Miqu=C3=A8l