Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 24 Mar 2023 13:36:55 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20230221163655.920289-3-mizhang@google.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
References: <20230221163655.920289-1-mizhang@google.com> <20230221163655.920289-3-mizhang@google.com>
Message-ID: <ZB4J54V16GQdcTrz@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/13] KVM: selftests: x86: Add a working xstate data structure
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To:     Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
        Venkatesh Srinivas <venkateshs@google.com>,
        Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com>,
        "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>,
        Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Precedence: bulk

Please omit the "x86:" from the shortlog.  I'm not necessarily against capturing
the arch somewhere in the shortlog for KVM selftests changes, but I want the
community as a whole to make a concious decision on if and how to do it.  I.e. I
don't want a bunch of ad hoc versions popping up because we'll end up with a mess.
E.g. I personally think three levels of scope is too much, and would rather do
something like "KVM: x86/selftests:" or "KVM: selftests/x86:".