Received: by 2002:a05:6358:11c7:b0:104:8066:f915 with SMTP id i7csp1662724rwl; Fri, 24 Mar 2023 13:45:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350YJW7Er/FYbtr5lsuXJ3q26fC4h8k8Q2qqXQaz8zaP7YE5E8832PKOVsdVorbj/S8zdtO+x X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c7d4:0:b0:4fb:1b0d:9f84 with SMTP id o20-20020aa7c7d4000000b004fb1b0d9f84mr4050282eds.6.1679690727023; Fri, 24 Mar 2023 13:45:27 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1679690727; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=UuV8RgnkD+nPbHIa5z1LJ3FZSs6e+0uwxzoPaNw7BSsneqW2/6MhodHE7BawZPyJkF x0+Il7ODX4BHtYU5eqZ4HGelkDNDJR7yz6czXbfit1G6ZXaYpuZjz8mwqQ9teX/Yr4vg PFAETS/OybFlZHPWb89zvQwmc/sNyMwLXc7ZUVvA8Ks1edTBjyY+05zeZEK3rcuu7cAS UwRgz+BoxXQU+k6FVkloWlEqRUyBFNB2FLY82tZM1hqIGkqIqVl52Ux89i1qrq08uqc6 BdNPzPY2vQd26OXbqSfYKNkPNHIYDzeGmy7GnQVGVnfqCAzkr1g4OPlN9X9E3Dt9+kEl ht4Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:in-reply-to:date:dkim-signature; bh=g9FsH5f+Xb8IXPDsf4Vq2M9YTg13c83UJ3Vl9FncU8A=; b=tZh87NOlzmBGjsp0TOYpfIEAXJKyIAFKNmiANLiGBL+QjflrL+0DolPDG5oRg348UD Ou8hzCFNc2jEWp1fdgRAQuaZtZBQdNOXv9N3dUUQzja8adC2JTUnjM7b3nhy0QMF++It cHvUxlRuuF56daJarSVf6i6lRaseatfb2Hu9CG8b3jgeLPNgSMqfj7VxS7e9GoM/RDtk eSrRWlRrrq+xX24su7p4+hk5yXnoPrmlDchtiqxGuyQZ4uRIZHuQ5itLHz8xi8YeKfYz ZBohYcPCPTsrpD+iuTYVkw4wS/AjgfETJXpbpR8w5iwbVDBJyKRjrEPx85fJqMtwImY3 loqQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=R1CJAKUE; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c14-20020aa7d60e000000b004ab0f51244csi20533051edr.622.2023.03.24.13.44.39; Fri, 24 Mar 2023 13:45:26 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=R1CJAKUE; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231460AbjCXUns (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 24 Mar 2023 16:43:48 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35566 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232157AbjCXUnr (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Mar 2023 16:43:47 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x649.google.com (mail-pl1-x649.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::649]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6921B5B8F for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2023 13:43:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x649.google.com with SMTP id h4-20020a170902f54400b001a1f5f00f3fso1790785plf.2 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2023 13:43:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; t=1679690625; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=g9FsH5f+Xb8IXPDsf4Vq2M9YTg13c83UJ3Vl9FncU8A=; b=R1CJAKUEiFUCOywhblEqKTuQ5/frQjfKCPjzY4EmGXnG/FZ8Mvl74UQXykJLT4izLW AC8Ga8LOADJ9jErvWBObdzLpjfKSPgoezDRFEkJI+4xJ5sSwPLpjJcb7SsFf/JZedd4g M44BNIsx8ZTxhshB1B0CI0siKLtgDNfkPvGG7N2Ltv9n6WO9Z8elgJ+MiA3TfoJh/lXb JHYrBxc46scu7edRhrqSNAK8P2K7QTVZz49wi6pdGRicPOuhFPDwlgc/Y5+QUUx66s4L q6FLJj9urtUdO4i5coFLMS/Q3yDAjLJmSNap9VFNAx4RPAoZXofFgNlMgFXkC48AVw93 jQhw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1679690625; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=g9FsH5f+Xb8IXPDsf4Vq2M9YTg13c83UJ3Vl9FncU8A=; b=n0KaR+7AL3XR5N/UTsaCy/gzdwAmj2GF0AYaNLziaFoCzsSlylaS/DozEihwfAJ7SF +hhxW0bZ1aapFpwhqgvOk5ZN2zX99hyGJM5nC3fdVEctDz04YVZztdV6OUyhn998QA8q XLKuscikgzJqDKpdf2nziJvxZDO9jJmqc5fEIyDiwgMncxqSMmS8NoWlkKcWsgXpAB0d 880wlAgmTJVfWdThidVXB8/ePHDvauIOD/lLSXbdUsf2GR/WvRQo81cTfyztUNJ7Lx0/ 7HPD1uBCW+hglF88/aGLo7FAHT6aYQGPDz7f7MxUkbbH2Q5/XE74VsP6iZl7PJqCX/vg BWKQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9f7h5RFM3tcHQFxAMfORL2pYNSqPSqDz3c97YKF+cObqrsC8W47 68VW5gqSAqinwuEoFH22G4B7rPhiR2s= X-Received: from zagreus.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:7f:e700:c0a8:5c37]) (user=seanjc job=sendgmr) by 2002:a17:90a:5141:b0:23d:50d0:4ba4 with SMTP id k1-20020a17090a514100b0023d50d04ba4mr1256858pjm.3.1679690624943; Fri, 24 Mar 2023 13:43:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 13:43:43 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20230221163655.920289-12-mizhang@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20230221163655.920289-1-mizhang@google.com> <20230221163655.920289-12-mizhang@google.com> Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/13] KVM: selftests: x86: Remove redundant check that XSAVE is supported From: Sean Christopherson To: Mingwei Zhang Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Jim Mattson , Venkatesh Srinivas , Aaron Lewis , "Chang S. Bae" , Chao Gao Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7 required=5.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 21, 2023, Mingwei Zhang wrote: > From: Aaron Lewis > > In amx_test, userspace requires that XSAVE is supported before running > the test, then the guest checks that it is supported after enabling > AMX. Remove the redundant check in the guest that XSAVE is supported. It's a bit paranoid, but I actually don't mind the extra check. It's not redundant per se, just useless in its current location. If the check is moved _before_ CR4 is set, then it actually provides value, e.g. if something does go sideways, will fire an assert instead of getting a #GP on set_cr4().