Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757227AbXITPQ2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Sep 2007 11:16:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755740AbXITPQV (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Sep 2007 11:16:21 -0400 Received: from vena.lwn.net ([206.168.112.25]:54355 "EHLO vena.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755309AbXITPQV (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Sep 2007 11:16:21 -0400 To: Andres Salomon Cc: Jonathan Corbet , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, v4l-dvb-maintainer@linuxtv.org, video4linux-list@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mchehab@infradead.org, Trent Piepho Subject: Re: [v4l-dvb-maintainer] [PATCH] cafe_ccic: default to allocating DMA buffers at probe time From: corbet@lwn.net (Jonathan Corbet) In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 19 Sep 2007 18:43:38 EDT." <20070919184338.64fc6e89.dilinger@queued.net> Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 09:16:20 -0600 Message-ID: <1068.1190301380@lwn.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 757 Lines: 17 Andres Salomon wrote: > That said, I'm not opposed to keeping the parameter name the same while > making the default 1; I just thought that the name 'alloc_bufs_at_read' was > clearer. Another option is to change it to 'no_alloc_bufs_at_load'. Jon, > any preference there? I don't think that negating it by adding no_ at the front helps much. In general, I prefer the name it has now, but it's not *that* big a deal. We've probably already expended more bandwidth than it's worth. jon - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/