Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sat, 25 Mar 2023 22:24:20 -0700
From:   Sumitra Sharma <sumitraartsy@gmail.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     outreachy@lists.linux.dev, johan@kernel.org, elder@kernel.org,
        greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] staging: greybus: Inline pwm_chip_to_gb_pwm_chip()
Message-ID: <20230326052420.GA179105@sumitra.com>
References: <cover.1679732179.git.sumitraartsy@gmail.com>
 <f1ef1b643840e74f211264dda0c590f8458618f6.1679732179.git.sumitraartsy@gmail.com>
 <ZB63EVLK6/29UUi0@kroah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZB63EVLK6/29UUi0@kroah.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 09:55:45AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 01:31:10AM -0700, Sumitra Sharma wrote:
> > Convert 'pwm_chip_to_gb_pwm_chip' from a macro to a static
> > inline function, to make the relevant types apparent in the
> > definition and to benefit from the type checking performed by
> > the compiler at call sites.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Sumitra Sharma <sumitraartsy@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/staging/greybus/pwm.c | 6 ++++--
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/pwm.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/pwm.c
> > index 3fda172239d2..88da1d796f13 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/pwm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/pwm.c
> > @@ -21,9 +21,11 @@ struct gb_pwm_chip {
> >  	struct pwm_chip		chip;
> >  	struct pwm_chip		*pwm;
> >  };
> > -#define pwm_chip_to_gb_pwm_chip(chip) \
> > -	container_of(chip, struct gb_pwm_chip, chip)
> >  
> > +static inline struct gb_pwm_chip *pwm_chip_to_gb_pwm_chip(struct pwm_chip *chip)
> > +{
> > +	return container_of(chip, struct gb_pwm_chip, chip);
> > +}
> >  
> >  static int gb_pwm_count_operation(struct gb_pwm_chip *pwmc)
> >  {
> > -- 
> > 2.25.1
> > 
> > 
> 
> This patch didn't apply due to changes made in my tree by a patch from
> someone else before yours.  Can you rebase it and resend?
>

Hi greg,

I am confused, will that be a totally new patch or a new version(v4 in
this case)?

Regards,

Sumitra

> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h