Received: by 2002:a05:6358:11c7:b0:104:8066:f915 with SMTP id i7csp1838394rwl; Sun, 26 Mar 2023 10:02:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350aDQHqujdmlo2c0FHD+4244duT7JPZbKiPdWQaWiRISoa4zStDTW9EoHN5nfctX53p1fFVI X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:465d:b0:de:af2f:fdeb with SMTP id eb29-20020a056a20465d00b000deaf2ffdebmr5456907pzb.3.1679850147377; Sun, 26 Mar 2023 10:02:27 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1679850147; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=OPlcH7k+O/b8BRELMSpXsrFd0b1z6NAsOyIIrzNg2TVSgBRosM+6FOwy5q/cWzrDAy NVjhWMx8LLz15eFtSEd7ioazDBifkMXBtszzfyhDQ8j3Lef4xgPoPKidCw9zDf3E7KG5 A9joT7b6h7Z0zgUi2eLSj6lfZRZ4Z4zyWSLLlg2jCY7u/vcZGtyrhfiPXDG9+ixNgIrh 3os89XuOibHCr7D5ZdOdQ6deClgSECLkww6wFYUGDcZwCcYJRIWWwepMMJmN9F7wSy6r E8rBLZisU8POSwoZllxBYU7UhZ8o6q1x0KQZV6XhZhGJzvJlc6suk4sQ+3ZLgaWIHZrL /Kbw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=5+1+1eooriZejzjITTTi79HVMc8p7O3jJc5KbF522b8=; b=VS2W4O8WwC7jiOzXLyafMH4UBt1+5nVHEel+S61jLU7EYm27p1eOpjvkS0ugsVTwFG ecrDG7rJIopXozJ9iDnCBZxmNzRE9A0kaLaUTWnnsHFEDDgUvL6rHSTUK7FVerA4lPYN hm5rvQtf+JIRVo+vH0xEkBXCd/cQbm3UHC1lAooF+O0kdVuhzAY8FIH0jDqfriIov77i M83773ebTtAevluBMy2rIj9Rb8x4+bXrKb0KLsray/K7r531D1xhaBXvjG2Ws0DVo8X0 PUCKQTJsHKfDQJUkr+U6AiAFAJSxDST4NHgJPPbr9Xvm9iyXmI9UxzQW9W0066IbvmXl AlvA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u186-20020a6385c3000000b004febc1dea83si25989544pgd.55.2023.03.26.10.02.06; Sun, 26 Mar 2023 10:02:27 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232206AbjCZQ4N (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 26 Mar 2023 12:56:13 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43392 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229601AbjCZQ4M (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Mar 2023 12:56:12 -0400 Received: from 1wt.eu (wtarreau.pck.nerim.net [62.212.114.60]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 675794C1F for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2023 09:56:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from willy@localhost) by mail.home.local (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 32QGtv5B011131; Sun, 26 Mar 2023 18:55:57 +0200 Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2023 18:55:57 +0200 From: Willy Tarreau To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: linux@weissschuh.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] tools/nolibc: add support for stack protector Message-ID: References: <20230325154516.7995-1-w@1wt.eu> <0d9bbc94-7ea2-4bc5-8523-29b100c0f1a1@paulmck-laptop> <35a26245-0171-44b0-8072-325576768f91@paulmck-laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 06:05:15PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 06:00:45PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 08:45:55AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > Glad I could "help"! Timers. Huh. ;-) > > > > > > Checking v6.2, though the rebase is a bit messy, so I won't be all > > > that confident in the results. > > > > I got the same as you now. I don't know what I missed before not to > > face it, maybe it's the consequence of the rebase. I've re-applied > > the patches on top of 6.2.8 and am retesting now. > > > > I think you don't need to waste more of your time on this for now > > since we have a reproducer. Thomas and I should take over. > > And it's a 6.3 regression, as 6.2.8 works fine: > > $ make run > (...) > Kernel: arch/x86/boot/bzImage is ready (#2) > make[1]: Leaving directory '/g/public/linux/master' > 126 test(s) passed. > $ tail run.out > Errors during this test: 0 > > Running test 'protection' > 0 -fstackprotector [OK] > Errors during this test: 0 > > Total number of errors: 0 > Leaving init with final status: 0 > [ 3.388706] ACPI: PM: Preparing to enter system sleep state S5 > [ 3.389424] reboot: Power down > > Now let's have fun bisecting it! So I have a good news, 6.3-rc1 which dev.2023.03.20a is based on, fails, while 6.3-rc3 works. I haven't got further yet and am not sure it's useful to dig further given that it's an already fixed problem that is not related to the patches in your branch. I don't know if you usually rebase on more recent tags though. Willy