Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 27 Mar 2023 17:24:03 +0500
From:   Khadija Kamran <kamrankhadijadj@gmail.com>
To:     outreachy@lists.linux.dev
Cc:     Marc Dietrich <marvin24@gmx.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        ac100@lists.launchpad.net, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] staging: nvec: replace udelay() with usleep_range()
Message-ID: <ZCGK4+zUDT1lLz6s@khadija-virtual-machine>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Precedence: bulk

Replace 'udelay()' with 'usleep_range()' with 1000us as upper limit.
This issue is reported by checkpatch.pl script.

CHECK: usleep_range is preferred over udelay; see
Documentation/timers/timers-howto.rst

Signed-off-by: Khadija Kamran <kamrankhadijadj@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c b/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c
index b3f114cb00dc..1b51935dba4f 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c
@@ -627,7 +627,7 @@ static irqreturn_t nvec_interrupt(int irq, void *dev)
 		break;
 	case 2:		/* first byte after command */
 		if (status == (I2C_SL_IRQ | RNW | RCVD)) {
-			udelay(33);
+			usleep_range(33, 1000);
 			if (nvec->rx->data[0] != 0x01) {
 				dev_err(nvec->dev,
 					"Read without prior read command\n");
@@ -714,7 +714,7 @@ static irqreturn_t nvec_interrupt(int irq, void *dev)
 	 * We experience less incomplete messages with this delay than without
 	 * it, but we don't know why. Help is appreciated.
 	 */
-	udelay(100);
+	usleep_range(100, 1000);
 
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
-- 
2.34.1