Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= <heiko@sntech.de>
To:     =?utf-8?B?T25kxZllag==?= Jirman <megi@xff.cz>,
        Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Robert Mader <robert.mader@collabora.com>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
        Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@gmail.com>,
        Jacopo Mondi <jacopo.mondi@ideasonboard.com>,
        Martijn Braam <martijn@brixit.nl>,
        Kamil =?utf-8?B?VHJ6Y2nFhHNraQ==?= <ayufan@ayufan.eu>,
        Caleb Connolly <kc@postmarketos.org>,
        Jarrah Gosbell <kernel@undef.tools>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Tom Fitzhenry <tom@tom-fitzhenry.me.uk>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: rk3399-pinephone-pro: Add internal display support
Date:   Mon, 27 Mar 2023 17:57:39 +0200
Message-ID: <1924921.PYKUYFuaPT@diego>
In-Reply-To: <87wn32rynm.fsf@minerva.mail-host-address-is-not-set>
References: <20230327074136.1459212-1-javierm@redhat.com>
 <20230327130147.wgxl2qayhzsi2xak@core>
 <87wn32rynm.fsf@minerva.mail-host-address-is-not-set>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Am Montag, 27. März 2023, 17:39:57 CEST schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas:
> Ondřej Jirman <megi@xff.cz> writes:
> 
> Hell Ondřej,
> 
> > Hi Javier,
> >
> > I've tried the patch on top of linus/master and it works as expected. My
> > DRM test app shows 16.669ms between frames. The display output is ok on
> > developer batch pinephone pro, and is corrupted on production version.
> > Display also doesn't come back after blanking. All as expected.
> >
> > Tested-by: Ondrej Jirman <megi@xff.cz>
> >
> 
> Thanks for testing.
> 
> > A few more comments below.
> >
> 
> I'm OK with these comments but I did a git diff with your orange-pi-6.3
> branch just before posting and this was the latest that's in your tree.
> 
> So feel free to either post a v3 addressing the things you are pointing
> out or lets land this and we can post any further cleanups on top IMO.

I would really like to _not_ apply essentially broken code, so really
would prefer the v3-approach.

Thanks
Heiko